Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sungjong Seo" <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
To: "'Tetsuhiro Kohada'" <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
Cc: <kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
<motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>,
"'Namjae Jeon'" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] exfat: add NameLength check when extracting name
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 01:54:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000101d66da4$8d1b5090$a751f1b0$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806055653.9329-1-kohada.t2@gmail.com>
> The current implementation doesn't care NameLength when extracting the
> name from Name dir-entries, so the name may be incorrect.
> (Without null-termination, Insufficient Name dir-entry, etc) Add a
> NameLength check when extracting the name from Name dir-entries to extract
> correct name.
> And, change to get the information of file/stream-ext dir-entries via the
> member variable of exfat_entry_set_cache.
>
> ** This patch depends on:
> '[PATCH v3] exfat: integrates dir-entry getting and validation'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/dir.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c index
> 91cdbede0fd1..545bb73b95e9 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
> @@ -28,16 +28,15 @@ static int exfat_extract_uni_name(struct exfat_dentry
> *ep,
>
> }
>
> -static void exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry(struct super_block *sb,
> - struct exfat_chain *p_dir, int entry, unsigned short
> *uniname)
> +static int exfat_get_uniname_from_name_entries(struct
> exfat_entry_set_cache *es,
> + struct exfat_uni_name *uniname)
> {
> - int i;
> - struct exfat_entry_set_cache *es;
> + int n, l, i;
> struct exfat_dentry *ep;
>
> - es = exfat_get_dentry_set(sb, p_dir, entry, ES_ALL_ENTRIES);
> - if (!es)
> - return;
> + uniname->name_len = es->de_stream->name_len;
> + if (uniname->name_len == 0)
> + return -EIO;
-EINVAL looks better.
>
> /*
> * First entry : file entry
> @@ -45,14 +44,15 @@ static void exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry(struct
> super_block *sb,
> * Third entry : first file-name entry
> * So, the index of first file-name dentry should start from 2.
> */
> -
> - i = 2;
> - while ((ep = exfat_get_validated_dentry(es, i++, TYPE_NAME))) {
> - exfat_extract_uni_name(ep, uniname);
> - uniname += EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN;
> + for (l = 0, n = 2; l < uniname->name_len; n++) {
> + ep = exfat_get_validated_dentry(es, n, TYPE_NAME);
> + if (!ep)
> + return -EIO;
> + for (i = 0; l < uniname->name_len && i <
EXFAT_FILE_NAME_LEN;
> i++, l++)
> + uniname->name[l] = le16_to_cpu(ep-
> >dentry.name.unicode_0_14[i]);
Looks good.
> }
> -
> - exfat_free_dentry_set(es, false);
> + uniname->name[l] = 0;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* read a directory entry from the opened directory */ @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
> static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry
> *dir_entry)
[snip]
> - *uni_name.name = 0x0;
> - exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry(sb, &dir, dentry,
> - uni_name.name);
> + dir_entry->size = le64_to_cpu(es->de_stream-
> >valid_size);
> +
> + exfat_get_uniname_from_name_entries(es, &uni_name);
Modified function has a return value.
It would be better to check the return value.
> exfat_utf16_to_nls(sb, &uni_name,
> dir_entry->namebuf.lfn,
> dir_entry->namebuf.lfnbuf_len);
> - brelse(bh);
>
> - ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, &clu, i + 1, &bh, NULL);
> - if (!ep)
> - return -EIO;
> - dir_entry->size =
> - le64_to_cpu(ep->dentry.stream.valid_size);
> - brelse(bh);
> + exfat_free_dentry_set(es, false);
>
> ei->hint_bmap.off = dentry >> dentries_per_clu_bits;
> ei->hint_bmap.clu = clu.dir;
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-08 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200806055718epcas1p33009b21ebf96b48d6e3f819065fade28@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2020-08-06 5:56 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-06 5:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] exfat: unify name extraction Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-08 17:19 ` Sungjong Seo
2020-08-12 6:02 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-21 10:41 ` Sungjong Seo
2020-08-25 10:15 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-08 16:54 ` Sungjong Seo [this message]
2020-08-12 4:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] exfat: add NameLength check when extracting name Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-10 6:13 ` Namjae Jeon
2020-08-12 15:04 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-13 2:53 ` Namjae Jeon
2020-08-17 9:26 ` Kohada.Tetsuhiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000101d66da4$8d1b5090$a751f1b0$@samsung.com' \
--to=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=kohada.t2@gmail.com \
--cc=kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--subject='RE: [PATCH 1/2] exfat: add NameLength check when extracting name' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).