Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] pipe: simplify round_pipe_size()
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 18:52:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110025201.GC931@zzz.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJ=fPOd9fmZbB0bd8C1JqazDgHCP2RsNDW0_xa9W41Vvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:27:10PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > @@ -1054,9 +1048,6 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned long arg)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >
> > - if (!nr_pages)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
>
> I would just leave this hunk anyway: it's defensive for any future
> changes. Maybe add a comment describing why it's currently redundant?
>
I don't know; I find it really confusing to have two slightly different checks
for the same thing, as it implies that they actually need to be there for a
reason. How about just checking nr_pages?
size = round_pipe_size(arg);
nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (nr_pages == 0)
return -EINVAL;
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 5:35 [PATCH 0/7] pipe: buffer limits fixes and cleanups Eric Biggers
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] pipe, sysctl: drop 'min' parameter from pipe-max-size converter Eric Biggers
2018-01-09 22:20 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-10 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
2018-01-10 17:30 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] pipe, sysctl: remove pipe_proc_fn() Eric Biggers
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] pipe: actually allow root to exceed the pipe buffer limits Eric Biggers
2018-01-09 22:23 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-10 2:34 ` Eric Biggers
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] pipe: fix off-by-one error when checking " Eric Biggers
2018-01-08 6:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] pipe: reject F_SETPIPE_SZ with size over UINT_MAX Eric Biggers
2018-01-09 22:24 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] pipe: simplify round_pipe_size() Eric Biggers
2018-01-09 22:27 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-10 2:52 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2018-01-10 3:13 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-08 5:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] pipe: read buffer limits atomically Eric Biggers
2018-01-09 22:27 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110025201.GC931@zzz.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 6/7] pipe: simplify round_pipe_size()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).