Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] fs: remove __vfs_read
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 08:45:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508154552.GB1431382@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200508092222.2097-11-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Fold it into the two callers.
In 5.7-rc4, it looks like __vfs_read() is called from
security/integrity/iint.c
Was that removed somewhere prior to this patch?
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/read_write.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 0ffbed5fd8136..f0009b506014c 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -419,17 +419,6 @@ static ssize_t new_sync_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t len, lo
> return ret;
> }
>
> -ssize_t __vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
> - loff_t *pos)
> -{
> - if (file->f_op->read)
> - return file->f_op->read(file, buf, count, pos);
> - else if (file->f_op->read_iter)
> - return new_sync_read(file, buf, count, pos);
> - else
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
> ssize_t __kernel_read(struct file *file, void *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> {
> mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> @@ -441,7 +430,12 @@ ssize_t __kernel_read(struct file *file, void *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> if (count > MAX_RW_COUNT)
> count = MAX_RW_COUNT;
> set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> - ret = __vfs_read(file, (void __user *)buf, count, pos);
> + if (file->f_op->read)
> + ret = file->f_op->read(file, (void __user *)buf, count, pos);
> + else if (file->f_op->read_iter)
> + ret = new_sync_read(file, (void __user *)buf, count, pos);
> + else
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> set_fs(old_fs);
> if (ret > 0) {
> fsnotify_access(file);
> @@ -474,17 +468,22 @@ ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file, pos, count);
> - if (!ret) {
> - if (count > MAX_RW_COUNT)
> - count = MAX_RW_COUNT;
> - ret = __vfs_read(file, buf, count, pos);
> - if (ret > 0) {
> - fsnotify_access(file);
> - add_rchar(current, ret);
> - }
> - inc_syscr(current);
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + if (count > MAX_RW_COUNT)
> + count = MAX_RW_COUNT;
Couldn't this clean up still happen while keeping __vfs_read()?
Ira
> + if (file->f_op->read)
> + ret = file->f_op->read(file, buf, count, pos);
> + else if (file->f_op->read_iter)
> + ret = new_sync_read(file, buf, count, pos);
> + else
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (ret > 0) {
> + fsnotify_access(file);
> + add_rchar(current, ret);
> + }
> + inc_syscr(current);
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 6441aaa25f8f2..4c10a07a36178 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1905,7 +1905,6 @@ ssize_t rw_copy_check_uvector(int type, const struct iovec __user * uvector,
> struct iovec *fast_pointer,
> struct iovec **ret_pointer);
>
> -extern ssize_t __vfs_read(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
> extern ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
> extern ssize_t vfs_write(struct file *, const char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
> extern ssize_t vfs_readv(struct file *, const struct iovec __user *,
> --
> 2.26.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 9:22 clean up kernel_{read,write} & friends Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: call file_{start,end}_write from __kernel_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs: check FMODE_WRITE in __kernel_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 03/11] fs: remove the call_{read,write}_iter functions Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] fs: implement kernel_write using __kernel_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] fs: remove __vfs_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] fs: don't change the address limit for ->write_iter in __kernel_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] fs: add a __kernel_read helper Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] integrity/ima: switch to using __kernel_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: implement kernel_read " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] fs: remove __vfs_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 15:45 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-05-08 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 9:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] fs: don't change the address limit for ->read_iter in __kernel_read Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200508154552.GB1431382@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 10/11] fs: remove __vfs_read' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).