Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	syzbot+8c91f5d054e998721c57@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 06/26] io_uring: initialize ctx->sqo_wait earlier
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 07:56:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528115654.1406165-6-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528115654.1406165-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

[ Upstream commit 583863ed918136412ddf14de2e12534f17cfdc6f ]

Ensure that ctx->sqo_wait is initialized as soon as the ctx is allocated,
instead of deferring it to the offload setup. This fixes a syzbot
reported lockdep complaint, which is really due to trying to wake_up
on an uninitialized wait queue:

RSP: 002b:00007fffb1fb9aa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001a9
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000441319
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 000000000000047b
RBP: 0000000000010475 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00000000004002c8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000402260
R13: 00000000004022f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 1 PID: 7090 Comm: syz-executor222 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1-next-20200415-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x188/0x20d lib/dump_stack.c:118
 assign_lock_key kernel/locking/lockdep.c:913 [inline]
 register_lock_class+0x1664/0x1760 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1225
 __lock_acquire+0x104/0x4c50 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4234
 lock_acquire+0x1f2/0x8f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4934
 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x8c/0xbf kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
 __wake_up_common_lock+0xb4/0x130 kernel/sched/wait.c:122
 io_cqring_ev_posted+0xa5/0x1e0 fs/io_uring.c:1160
 io_poll_remove_all fs/io_uring.c:4357 [inline]
 io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill+0x2bc/0x5a0 fs/io_uring.c:7305
 io_uring_create fs/io_uring.c:7843 [inline]
 io_uring_setup+0x115e/0x22b0 fs/io_uring.c:7870
 do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x7d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:295
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
RIP: 0033:0x441319
Code: e8 5c ae 02 00 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 bb 0a fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007fffb1fb9aa8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001a9

Reported-by: syzbot+8c91f5d054e998721c57@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b2ccb908f6b6..2050100e6e84 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ static struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
 	}
 
 	ctx->flags = p->flags;
+	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->sqo_wait);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->cq_wait);
 	init_completion(&ctx->ctx_done);
 	init_completion(&ctx->sqo_thread_started);
@@ -3237,7 +3238,6 @@ static int io_sq_offload_start(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->sqo_wait);
 	mmgrab(current->mm);
 	ctx->sqo_mm = current->mm;
 
-- 
2.25.1


           reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20200528115654.1406165-1-sashal@kernel.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200528115654.1406165-6-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+8c91f5d054e998721c57@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 06/26] io_uring: initialize ctx->sqo_wait earlier' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).