Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:11:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200611081203.18161-1-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611075033.1248-1-jack@suse.cz>
Currently, operations on inode->i_io_list are protected by
wb->list_lock. In the following patches we'll need to maintain
consistency between inode->i_state and inode->i_io_list so change the
code so that inode->i_lock protects also all inode's i_io_list handling.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index a605c3dddabc..ff0b18331590 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static void inode_io_list_del_locked(struct inode *inode,
struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
+ assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list);
wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb);
@@ -1122,7 +1123,9 @@ void inode_io_list_del(struct inode *inode)
struct bdi_writeback *wb;
wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode);
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, wb);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_io_list_del);
@@ -1172,8 +1175,10 @@ void sb_clear_inode_writeback(struct inode *inode)
* the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
* out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
*/
-static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
+ assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
+
if (!list_empty(&wb->b_dirty)) {
struct inode *tail;
@@ -1184,6 +1189,13 @@ static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty);
}
+static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+}
+
/*
* requeue inode for re-scanning after bdi->b_io list is exhausted.
*/
@@ -1394,7 +1406,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
* writeback is not making progress due to locked
* buffers. Skip this inode for now.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
return;
}
@@ -1414,7 +1426,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
* retrying writeback of the dirty page/inode
* that cannot be performed immediately.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
}
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
/*
@@ -1422,7 +1434,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
* such as delayed allocation during submission or metadata
* updates after data IO completion.
*/
- redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
} else if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_TIME) {
inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
inode_io_list_move_locked(inode, wb, &wb->b_dirty_time);
@@ -1669,8 +1681,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
*/
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
+ redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- redirty_tail(inode, wb);
continue;
}
if ((inode->i_state & I_SYNC) && wbc.sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) {
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 8:11 [PATCH 0/4 v2] writeback: Lazytime handling fix and cleanups Jan Kara
2020-06-11 8:11 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-06-12 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock Martijn Coenen
2020-06-15 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-11 8:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback Jan Kara
2020-06-12 8:03 ` Martijn Coenen
2020-06-15 7:15 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-15 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-15 7:15 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-11 8:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: Fix sync livelock due to b_dirty_time processing Jan Kara
2020-06-15 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-11 8:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: Drop I_DIRTY_TIME_EXPIRE Jan Kara
2020-09-02 17:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-03 10:10 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200611081203.18161-1-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/4] writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).