Linux-Fsdevel Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <>
To: Eric Biggers <>
Cc:, Alexander Viro <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: define inode flags using bit numbers
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:59:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 08:09:52PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Define the VFS inode flags using bit numbers instead of hardcoding
> powers of 2, which has become unwieldy now that we're up to 65536.

If you're going to change these, why not use the BIT() macro?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-13 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-13  3:09 Eric Biggers
2020-07-13 11:59 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-07-13 16:02   ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-14  1:18     ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-27 16:48 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-27 18:38   ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] fs: define inode flags using bit numbers' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).