From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC71C433E0 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778B92074F for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730574AbgG0Sih (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:38:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730376AbgG0Sig (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:38:36 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD02C061794 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k081D-003p01-Ex; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:38:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:38:35 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: define inode flags using bit numbers Message-ID: <20200727183835.GJ794331@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200713030952.192348-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20200727164809.GG1138@sol.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200727164809.GG1138@sol.localdomain> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:48:09AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 08:09:52PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > From: Eric Biggers > > > > Define the VFS inode flags using bit numbers instead of hardcoding > > powers of 2, which has become unwieldy now that we're up to 65536. > > > > No change in the actual values. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > > Al, any interest in taking this patch? *shrug* I don't see much point in that, but... might as well. Applied.