Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] mem: remove duplicate ops for /dev/zero and /dev/null
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:32:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817073212.830069-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817073212.830069-1-hch@lst.de>

There is no good reason to implement both the traditional ->read and
->write as well as the iter based ops.  So implement just the iter
based ones.

Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/char/mem.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index 687d4af6945d36..14851f36787372 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -670,18 +670,6 @@ static ssize_t write_port(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	return tmp-buf;
 }
 
-static ssize_t read_null(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
-			 size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static ssize_t write_null(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
-			  size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
-	return count;
-}
-
 static ssize_t read_iter_null(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 {
 	return 0;
@@ -872,7 +860,6 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 
 #define zero_lseek	null_lseek
 #define full_lseek      null_lseek
-#define write_zero	write_null
 #define write_iter_zero	write_iter_null
 #define open_mem	open_port
 #define open_kmem	open_mem
@@ -903,8 +890,6 @@ static const struct file_operations __maybe_unused kmem_fops = {
 
 static const struct file_operations null_fops = {
 	.llseek		= null_lseek,
-	.read		= read_null,
-	.write		= write_null,
 	.read_iter	= read_iter_null,
 	.write_iter	= write_iter_null,
 	.splice_write	= splice_write_null,
@@ -919,7 +904,6 @@ static const struct file_operations __maybe_unused port_fops = {
 
 static const struct file_operations zero_fops = {
 	.llseek		= zero_lseek,
-	.write		= write_zero,
 	.read_iter	= read_iter_zero,
 	.write_iter	= write_iter_zero,
 	.mmap		= mmap_zero,
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-17  7:32 remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-18 19:33   ` [PATCH 01/11] mem: remove duplicate ops for /dev/zero and /dev/null Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:34   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:39   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-18 19:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:58       ` Kees Cook
2020-08-18 20:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] uaccess: add infrastructure for kernel builds with set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:40   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] test_bitmap: skip user bitmap tests for !CONFIG_SET_FS Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:50   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-17  7:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:43   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] lkdtm: disable set_fs-based " Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:32   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: move PAGE_OFFSET, TASK_SIZE & friends to page_{32,64}_types.h Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:27   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86: make TASK_SIZE_MAX usable from assembly code Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:44   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-18 19:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 19:59       ` Kees Cook
2020-08-18 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 20:08           ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: remove address space overrides using set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  8:23   ` David Laight
2020-08-27  9:37     ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2020-08-18 19:46   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc: use non-set_fs based maccess routines Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 15:47   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-17  7:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] powerpc: remove address space overrides using set_fs() Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:39 ` remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86 and powerpc Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 17:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-18 18:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 18:23     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-19  7:16       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-19  7:22         ` iter and normal ops on /dev/zero & co, was " Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200817073212.830069-2-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 01/11] mem: remove duplicate ops for /dev/zero and /dev/null' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).