Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
minlei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Fix the write_count in iomap_add_to_ioend().
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:04:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917080455.GY26262@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916130714.GA1681377@bfoster>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:07:14AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Dave described the main purpose earlier in this thread [1]. The initial
> motivation is that we've had downstream reports of soft lockup problems
> in writeback bio completion down in the bio -> bvec loop of
> iomap_finish_ioend() that has to finish writeback on each individual
> page of insanely large bios and/or chains. We've also had an upstream
> reports of a similar problem on linux-xfs [2].
>
> The magic number itself was just pulled out of a hat. I picked it
> because it seemed conservative enough to still allow large contiguous
> bios (1GB w/ 4k pages) while hopefully preventing I/O completion
> problems, but was hoping for some feedback on that bit if the general
> approach was acceptable. I was also waiting for some feedback on either
> of the two users who reported the problem but I don't think I've heard
> back on that yet...
I think the saner answer is to always run large completions in the
workqueue, and add a bunch of cond_resched() calls, rather than
arbitrarily breaking up the I/O size.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-19 10:28 Anju T Sudhakar
2020-08-20 23:11 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-21 4:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-08-21 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-21 9:09 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-08-21 21:53 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24 14:28 ` Brian Foster
2020-08-24 15:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24 15:48 ` Brian Foster
2020-08-25 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-25 14:49 ` Brian Foster
2020-08-31 4:01 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-31 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-16 0:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-16 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-16 13:07 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-17 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-09-17 10:42 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-17 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 21:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-17 23:13 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-21 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-21 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-21 8:53 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-08-21 14:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-21 13:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917080455.GY26262@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minlei@redhat.com \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] iomap: Fix the write_count in iomap_add_to_ioend().' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).