Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Justin Sanders <justin@coraid.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:13:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922091314.GD16464@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921080734.452759-8-hch@lst.de>
On Mon 21-09-20 10:07:28, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Drivers shouldn't really mess with the readahead size, as that is a VM
> concept. Instead set it based on the optimal I/O size by lifting the
> algorithm from the md driver when registering the disk. Also set
> bdi->io_pages there as well by applying the same scheme based on
> max_sectors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
...
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 76a7e03bcd6cac..01049e9b998f1d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_limits_io_opt);
> void blk_queue_io_opt(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int opt)
> {
> blk_limits_io_opt(&q->limits, opt);
> + q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
> + max(queue_io_opt(q) * 2 / PAGE_SIZE, VM_READAHEAD_PAGES);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_io_opt);
>
> @@ -628,9 +630,6 @@ void disk_stack_limits(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev,
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Warning: Device %s is misaligned\n",
> top, bottom);
> }
> -
> - t->backing_dev_info->io_pages =
> - t->limits.max_sectors >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(disk_stack_limits);
One thing I've noticed is that blk_stack_limits() does not use
blk_queue_io_opt() to set new optimal limit. That means that ra_pages won't
be updated for the new queue. E.g. your DRDB change below will result in
ra_pages not being properly updated AFAICT.
Similarly it isn't clear to me how io_pages would get updated after
blk_stack_limits() updates max_hw_sectors...
Otherwise the patch looks good.
Honza
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> index aaff5bde391506..f8fb1c9b1bb6c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> @@ -1360,18 +1360,8 @@ static void drbd_setup_queue_param(struct drbd_device *device, struct drbd_backi
> decide_on_discard_support(device, q, b, discard_zeroes_if_aligned);
> decide_on_write_same_support(device, q, b, o, disable_write_same);
>
> - if (b) {
> + if (b)
> blk_stack_limits(&q->limits, &b->limits, 0);
> -
> - if (q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages !=
> - b->backing_dev_info->ra_pages) {
> - drbd_info(device, "Adjusting my ra_pages to backing device's (%lu -> %lu)\n",
> - q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages,
> - b->backing_dev_info->ra_pages);
> - q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
> - b->backing_dev_info->ra_pages;
> - }
> - }
> fixup_discard_if_not_supported(q);
> fixup_write_zeroes(device, q);
> }
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-21 8:07 bdi cleanups v6 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] fs: remove the unused SB_I_MULTIROOT flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] drbd: remove dead code in device_to_statistics Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] bcache: inherit the optimal I/O size Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 9:54 ` Coly Li
2020-09-21 14:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 15:09 ` Coly Li
2020-09-21 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 8:44 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-22 9:39 ` Coly Li
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] aoe: set an " Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 8:45 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] bdi: initialize ->ra_pages and ->io_pages in bdi_init Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 8:49 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-23 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] md: update the optimal I/O size on reshape Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-22 9:13 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-09-22 9:51 ` Coly Li
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] mm: use SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO more intelligently Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] bdi: replace BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES with a queue and a sb flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] bdi: invert BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-21 8:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] bdi: replace BDI_CAP_NO_{WRITEBACK,ACCT_DIRTY} with a single flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 6:51 bdi cleanups v7 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 6:51 ` [PATCH 07/13] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-24 14:53 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-24 15:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-24 15:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200922091314.GD16464@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=justin@coraid.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 07/13] block: lift setting the readahead size into the block layer' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).