Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Huang <adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dax: Fix stack overflow when mounting fsdax pmem device
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:59:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <356f8764-9699-e268-681f-0531d284079f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917111549.6367-1-adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>
ccing fs list
On 9/17/20 4:45 PM, Adrian Huang wrote:
> From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
>
> When mounting fsdax pmem device, commit 6180bb446ab6 ("dax: fix
> detection of dax support for non-persistent memory block devices")
> introduces the stack overflow [1][2]. Here is the call path for
> mounting ext4 file system:
> ext4_fill_super
> bdev_dax_supported
> __bdev_dax_supported
> dax_supported
> generic_fsdax_supported
> __generic_fsdax_supported
> bdev_dax_supported
>
> The call path leads to the infinite calling loop, so we cannot
> call bdev_dax_supported() in __generic_fsdax_supported(). The sanity
> checking of the variable 'dax_dev' is moved prior to the two
> bdev_dax_pgoff() checks [3][4].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/1420999447.1004543.1600055488770.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/alpine.LRH.2.02.2009141131220.30651@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/CA+RJvhxBHriCuJhm-D8NvJRe3h2MLM+ZMFgjeJjrRPerMRLvdg@mail.gmail.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/20200903160608.GU878166@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com/
>
> Fixes: 6180bb446ab6 ("dax: fix detection of dax support for non-persistent memory block devices")
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Cc: John Pittman <jpittman@redhat.com>
Although I see that this is fix is already applied but ccing fsdevel and
ext4 since I ended up debugging and coming to the same conclusion as
this patch is fixing the recursion loop.
If not already applied then feel free to add:
Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v3:
> 1. Add Reviewed-by from Jan
> 2. Add Reported-by
> 3. Replace lists.01.org with lore.kernel
> v2:
> Remove the checking for the returned value '-EOPNOTSUPP' of
> dax_direct_access(). Jan has prepared a patch to address the
> issue in dm.
> ---
> drivers/dax/super.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
> index e5767c83ea23..11d0541e6f8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ bool __generic_fsdax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (!dax_dev) {
> + pr_debug("%s: error: dax unsupported by block device\n",
> + bdevname(bdev, buf));
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> err = bdev_dax_pgoff(bdev, start, PAGE_SIZE, &pgoff);
> if (err) {
> pr_info("%s: error: unaligned partition for dax\n",
> @@ -100,12 +106,6 @@ bool __generic_fsdax_supported(struct dax_device *dax_dev,
> return false;
> }
>
> - if (!dax_dev || !bdev_dax_supported(bdev, blocksize)) {
> - pr_debug("%s: error: dax unsupported by block device\n",
> - bdevname(bdev, buf));
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> id = dax_read_lock();
> len = dax_direct_access(dax_dev, pgoff, 1, &kaddr, &pfn);
> len2 = dax_direct_access(dax_dev, pgoff_end, 1, &end_kaddr, &end_pfn);
>
parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20200917111549.6367-1-adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=356f8764-9699-e268-681f-0531d284079f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adrianhuang0701@gmail.com \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] dax: Fix stack overflow when mounting fsdax pmem device' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).