Linux-Fsdevel Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qian Cai <>
To: Rafael Aquini <>
Cc: Andrew Morton <>,
	LKML <>,,,,,
	Baoquan He <>, Jonathan Corbet <>,
	Luis Chamberlain <>,
	Kees Cook <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: add panic_on_taint
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 20:28:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507233634.GA367616@optiplex-lnx>

> On May 7, 2020, at 7:36 PM, Rafael Aquini <> wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 07:07:20PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> On May 7, 2020, at 6:15 PM, Rafael Aquini <> wrote:
>>> It's a reasonable and self-contained feature that we have a valid use for. 
>>> I honestly fail to see it causing that amount of annoyance as you are 
>>> suggesting here.
>> It is not a big trouble yet, but keeping an obsolete patch that not very straightforward to figure out that it will be superseded by the panic_on_taint patch will only cause more confusion the longer it has stayed in linux-next.
>> The thing is that even if you can’t get this panic_on_taint (the superior solution) patch accepted for some reasons, someone else could still work on it until it get merged.
>> Thus, I failed to see any possibility we will go back to the inferior solution (mm-slub-add-panic_on_error-to-the-debug-facilities.patch) by all means.
> There are plenty of examples of things being added, changed, and
> removed in -next. IOW, living in a transient state. I think it's 
> a reasonable compromise to keep it while the other one is beind 
> ironed out.
> The fact that you prefer one solution to another doesn't
> invalidate the one you dislike. 

As far I can tell, the bar of the other core subsystems are quite high even for linux-next. People have been voiced over and over again to urge Andrew not picking up patches so eagerly, but I will save that discussion for the next time.

Anyway, thanks for working for the panic_on_taint patch. I believe it could be useful for all testing agents to catch those bad pages earlier.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-06 22:28 Rafael Aquini
2020-05-06 23:24 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-05-07  0:12   ` Rafael Aquini
2020-05-07  0:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-07  2:50 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-07 20:42   ` Rafael Aquini
2020-05-07 22:05     ` Qian Cai
2020-05-07 22:15       ` Rafael Aquini
2020-05-07 23:07         ` Qian Cai
2020-05-07 23:36           ` Rafael Aquini
2020-05-08  0:28             ` Qian Cai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] kernel: add panic_on_taint' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).