Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info
@ 2020-09-09 7:56 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-09-12 5:01 ` Sungjong Seo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuhiro Kohada @ 2020-09-09 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kohada.t2
Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro, mori.takahiro, motai.hirotaka, Namjae Jeon,
Sungjong Seo, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the parameter(cpos) of exfat_readdir.
Since rwoffset of is referenced only by exfat_readdir, it is not necessary a exfat_inode_info's member.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
---
fs/exfat/dir.c | 16 ++++++----------
fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 2 --
fs/exfat/file.c | 2 --
fs/exfat/inode.c | 3 ---
fs/exfat/super.c | 1 -
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c
index a9b13ae3f325..fa5bb72aa295 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry(struct super_block *sb,
}
/* read a directory entry from the opened directory */
-static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry *dir_entry)
+static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, loff_t *cpos, struct exfat_dir_entry *dir_entry)
{
int i, dentries_per_clu, dentries_per_clu_bits = 0;
unsigned int type, clu_offset;
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry *dir_entry)
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
- unsigned int dentry = ei->rwoffset & 0xFFFFFFFF;
+ unsigned int dentry = EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(*cpos) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
struct buffer_head *bh;
/* check if the given file ID is opened */
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry *dir_entry)
ei->hint_bmap.off = dentry >> dentries_per_clu_bits;
ei->hint_bmap.clu = clu.dir;
- ei->rwoffset = ++dentry;
+ *cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(++dentry);
return 0;
}
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int exfat_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry *dir_entry)
}
dir_entry->namebuf.lfn[0] = '\0';
- ei->rwoffset = dentry;
+ *cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(dentry);
return 0;
}
@@ -242,12 +242,10 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
if (err)
goto unlock;
get_new:
- ei->rwoffset = EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos);
-
if (cpos >= i_size_read(inode))
goto end_of_dir;
- err = exfat_readdir(inode, &de);
+ err = exfat_readdir(inode, &cpos, &de);
if (err) {
/*
* At least we tried to read a sector. Move cpos to next sector
@@ -262,13 +260,11 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
goto end_of_dir;
}
- cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(ei->rwoffset);
-
if (!nb->lfn[0])
goto end_of_dir;
i_pos = ((loff_t)ei->start_clu << 32) |
- ((ei->rwoffset - 1) & 0xffffffff);
+ (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos-1) & 0xffffffff);
tmp = exfat_iget(sb, i_pos);
if (tmp) {
inum = tmp->i_ino;
diff --git a/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h b/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
index 44dc04520175..e586daf5a2e7 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
+++ b/fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h
@@ -263,8 +263,6 @@ struct exfat_inode_info {
* the validation of hint_stat.
*/
unsigned int version;
- /* file offset or dentry index for readdir */
- loff_t rwoffset;
/* hint for cluster last accessed */
struct exfat_hint hint_bmap;
diff --git a/fs/exfat/file.c b/fs/exfat/file.c
index 4831a39632a1..a92478eabfa4 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/file.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/file.c
@@ -208,8 +208,6 @@ int __exfat_truncate(struct inode *inode, loff_t new_size)
/* hint information */
ei->hint_bmap.off = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
ei->hint_bmap.clu = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
- if (ei->rwoffset > new_size)
- ei->rwoffset = new_size;
/* hint_stat will be used if this is directory. */
ei->hint_stat.eidx = 0;
diff --git a/fs/exfat/inode.c b/fs/exfat/inode.c
index 7f90204adef5..70a33d4807c3 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
@@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ static int exfat_map_cluster(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu_offset,
unsigned int local_clu_offset = clu_offset;
unsigned int num_to_be_allocated = 0, num_clusters = 0;
- ei->rwoffset = EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(clu_offset, sbi);
-
if (EXFAT_I(inode)->i_size_ondisk > 0)
num_clusters =
EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(EXFAT_I(inode)->i_size_ondisk,
@@ -567,7 +565,6 @@ static int exfat_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_dir_entry *info)
ei->hint_stat.eidx = 0;
ei->hint_stat.clu = info->start_clu;
ei->hint_femp.eidx = EXFAT_HINT_NONE;
- ei->rwoffset = 0;
ei->hint_bmap.off = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
ei->i_pos = 0;
diff --git a/fs/exfat/super.c b/fs/exfat/super.c
index 3b6a1659892f..b29935a91b9b 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/super.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/super.c
@@ -342,7 +342,6 @@ static int exfat_read_root(struct inode *inode)
ei->flags = ALLOC_FAT_CHAIN;
ei->type = TYPE_DIR;
ei->version = 0;
- ei->rwoffset = 0;
ei->hint_bmap.off = EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER;
ei->hint_stat.eidx = 0;
ei->hint_stat.clu = sbi->root_dir;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info
2020-09-09 7:56 ` [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info Tetsuhiro Kohada
@ 2020-09-12 5:01 ` Sungjong Seo
2020-09-16 5:35 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sungjong Seo @ 2020-09-12 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tetsuhiro Kohada'
Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro, mori.takahiro, motai.hirotaka,
'Namjae Jeon',
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
> Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the
> parameter(cpos) of exfat_readdir.
> Since rwoffset of is referenced only by exfat_readdir, it is not
> necessary a exfat_inode_info's member.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/dir.c | 16 ++++++----------
> fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 2 --
> fs/exfat/file.c | 2 --
> fs/exfat/inode.c | 3 ---
> fs/exfat/super.c | 1 -
> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c index
> a9b13ae3f325..fa5bb72aa295 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
[snip]
> sector @@ -262,13 +260,11 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp,
> struct dir_context *ctx)
> goto end_of_dir;
> }
>
> - cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(ei->rwoffset);
> -
> if (!nb->lfn[0])
> goto end_of_dir;
>
> i_pos = ((loff_t)ei->start_clu << 32) |
> - ((ei->rwoffset - 1) & 0xffffffff);
> + (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos-1) & 0xffffffff);
Need to fix the above line to be:
(EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos)-1)) & 0xffffffff);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info
2020-09-12 5:01 ` Sungjong Seo
@ 2020-09-16 5:35 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-09-25 0:56 ` Sungjong Seo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuhiro Kohada @ 2020-09-16 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sungjong Seo
Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro, mori.takahiro, motai.hirotaka,
'Namjae Jeon',
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
On 2020/09/12 14:01, Sungjong Seo wrote:
>> Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the
>> parameter(cpos) of exfat_readdir.
>> Since rwoffset of is referenced only by exfat_readdir, it is not
>> necessary a exfat_inode_info's member.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/exfat/dir.c | 16 ++++++----------
>> fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 2 --
>> fs/exfat/file.c | 2 --
>> fs/exfat/inode.c | 3 ---
>> fs/exfat/super.c | 1 -
>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c index
>> a9b13ae3f325..fa5bb72aa295 100644
>> --- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
> [snip]
>> sector @@ -262,13 +260,11 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file *filp,
>> struct dir_context *ctx)
>> goto end_of_dir;
>> }
>>
>> - cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(ei->rwoffset);
>> -
>> if (!nb->lfn[0])
>> goto end_of_dir;
>>
>> i_pos = ((loff_t)ei->start_clu << 32) |
>> - ((ei->rwoffset - 1) & 0xffffffff);
>> + (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos-1) & 0xffffffff);
>
> Need to fix the above line to be:
> (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos)-1)) & 0xffffffff);
Here, we simply converted so that the calculation results would be the same.
But after reading it carefully again, I noticed.
- Why use the previous entry?
- Why does cpos point to stream dir-entry in entry-set?
For the former, there is no need to "++dentry" in exfat_readdir().
For the latter, I think cpos should point to the next to current entry-set.
I'll make V2 considering these.
How do you think?
BR
---
Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info
2020-09-16 5:35 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
@ 2020-09-25 0:56 ` Sungjong Seo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sungjong Seo @ 2020-09-25 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tetsuhiro Kohada'
Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro, mori.takahiro, motai.hirotaka,
'Namjae Jeon',
linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
> On 2020/09/12 14:01, Sungjong Seo wrote:
> >> Remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info and replace it with the
> >> parameter(cpos) of exfat_readdir.
> >> Since rwoffset of is referenced only by exfat_readdir, it is not
> >> necessary a exfat_inode_info's member.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/exfat/dir.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >> fs/exfat/exfat_fs.h | 2 --
> >> fs/exfat/file.c | 2 --
> >> fs/exfat/inode.c | 3 ---
> >> fs/exfat/super.c | 1 -
> >> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/exfat/dir.c b/fs/exfat/dir.c index
> >> a9b13ae3f325..fa5bb72aa295 100644
> >> --- a/fs/exfat/dir.c
> >> +++ b/fs/exfat/dir.c
> > [snip]
> >> sector @@ -262,13 +260,11 @@ static int exfat_iterate(struct file
> >> *filp, struct dir_context *ctx)
> >> goto end_of_dir;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - cpos = EXFAT_DEN_TO_B(ei->rwoffset);
> >> -
> >> if (!nb->lfn[0])
> >> goto end_of_dir;
> >>
> >> i_pos = ((loff_t)ei->start_clu << 32) |
> >> - ((ei->rwoffset - 1) & 0xffffffff);
> >> + (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos-1) & 0xffffffff);
> >
> > Need to fix the above line to be:
> > (EXFAT_B_TO_DEN(cpos)-1)) & 0xffffffff);
>
>
> Here, we simply converted so that the calculation results would be the
> same.
> But after reading it carefully again, I noticed.
> - Why use the previous entry?
> - Why does cpos point to stream dir-entry in entry-set?
>
> For the former, there is no need to "++dentry" in exfat_readdir().
> For the latter, I think cpos should point to the next to current entry-set.
>
> I'll make V2 considering these.
> How do you think?
The latter looks better.
>
> BR
> ---
> Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-25 1:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20200909075713epcas1p44c2503251f78baa2fde0ce4351bf936d@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2020-09-09 7:56 ` [PATCH] exfat: remove 'rwoffset' in exfat_inode_info Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-09-12 5:01 ` Sungjong Seo
2020-09-16 5:35 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-09-25 0:56 ` Sungjong Seo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).