Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Setting mount propagation type in new mount API
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:04:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKeNEdpY77xCWvPg-i4vQBoKLX3Y96gvf1kL7Pe29rmq_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgNAkioH1z-pVimHziWP=ZtyBgCOwoC7ekWGFwzaZ1FPYg-tA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:40 PM Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello David, Miklos,
>
> I've been looking at the new mount API (fsopen(), fsconfig(),
> fsmount(), move_mount(), etc.) and among the details that remain
> mysterious to me is this: how does one set the propagation type
> (private/shared/slave/unbindable) of a new mount and change the
> propagation type of an existing mount?
Existing mount can be chaged with mount(NULL, path, NULL, MS_$(propflag), NULL).
To do that with a detached mount created by fsmount(2) the
"/proc/self/fd/$fd" trick can be used.
The plan was to introduce a mount_setattr(2) syscall, but that hasn't
happened yet... I'm not sure we should be adding propagation flags to
fsmount(2), since that is a less generic mechanism than
mount_setattr(2) or just plain mount(2) as shown above.
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-15 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-15 11:40 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-05-15 13:04 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2020-05-15 13:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-05-18 14:30 ` David Howells
2020-05-18 14:42 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOssrKeNEdpY77xCWvPg-i4vQBoKLX3Y96gvf1kL7Pe29rmq_w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--subject='Re: Setting mount propagation type in new mount API' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).