Linux-Fsdevel Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>
To: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Cc: kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
	mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
	motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
	'Namjae Jeon' <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] exfat: remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:36:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c635e965-6b78-436a-3959-e4777e1732c1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500801d64572$0bdd2940$23977bc0$@samsung.com>


On 2020/06/18 22:11, Sungjong Seo wrote:
>> BTW
>> Even with this patch applied,  VOL_DIRTY remains until synced in the above
>> case.
>> It's not  easy to reproduce as rmdir, but I'll try to fix it in the future.
> 
> I think it's not a problem not to clear VOL_DIRTY under real errors,
> because VOL_DIRTY is just like a hint to note that write was not finished clearly.
> 
> If you mean there are more situation like ENOTEMPTY you mentioned,
> please make new patch to fix them.


When should VOL_DIRTY be cleared?

The current behavior is ...

Case of  mkdir, rmdir, rename:
   - set VOL_DIRTY before operation
   - set VOL_CLEAN after operating.
In async mode, it is actually written to the media after 30 seconds.

Case of  cp, touch:
   - set VOL_DIRTY before operation
   - however, VOL_CLEAN is not called in this context.
VOL_CLEAN will call by sync_fs or unmount.

I added VOL_CLEAN in last of __exfat_write_inode() and exfat_map_cluster().
As a result, VOL_DIRTY is cleared with cp and touch.
However, when copying a many files ...
  - Async mode: VOL_DIRTY is written to the media twice every 30 seconds.
  - Sync mode: Of course,  VOL_DIRTY and VOL_CLEAN to the media for each file.

Frequent writing VOL_DIRTY and VOL_CLEAN  increases the risk of boot-sector curruption.
If the boot-sector corrupted, it causes the following serious problems  on some OSs.
  - misjudge as unformatted
  - can't judge as exfat
  - can't repair

I want to minimize boot sector writes, to reduce these risk.

I looked vfat/udf implementation, which manages similar dirty information on linux,
and found that they ware mark-dirty at mount and cleared at unmount.

Here are some ways to clear VOL_DIRTY.

(A) VOL_CLEAN after every write operation.
   :-) Ejectable at any time after a write operation.
   :-( Many times write to Boot-sector.

(B) dirty at mount, clear at unmount (same as vfat/udf)
   :-) Write to boot-sector twice.
   :-( It remains dirty unless unmounted.
   :-( Write to boot-sector even if there is no write operation. 

(C) dirty on first write operation, clear on unmount
   :-) Writing to boot-sector is minimal.
   :-) Will not write to the boot-sector if there is no write operation.
   :-( It remains dirty unless unmounted.

(D) dirty on first write operation,  clear on sync-fs/unmount
  :-) Writing to boot-sector can be reduced.
  :-) Will not write to the boot-sector if there is no write operation.
  :-) sync-fs makes it clean and ejectable immidiately.
  :-( It remains dirty unless sync-fs or unmount.
  :-( Frequent sync-fs will  increases writes to boot-sector.

I think it should be (C) or(D).
What do you think?



BR
---
Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@gmail.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-10  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200616021816epcas1p44b0833f14bbad0e25cc0efb27fb2ebd3@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2020-06-16  2:18 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-06-16 23:55   ` Namjae Jeon
2020-06-17  7:20   ` Sungjong Seo
2020-06-17  8:41     ` Namjae Jeon
2020-06-18  8:36     ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-06-18 13:11       ` Sungjong Seo
2020-06-19  4:22         ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-07-10  7:36         ` Tetsuhiro Kohada [this message]
2020-08-08 17:47           ` Sungjong Seo
2020-08-12  9:19             ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-08-13  4:03               ` Namjae Jeon
2020-08-18  1:20                 ` Tetsuhiro Kohada
2020-06-16  6:16 Markus Elfring
2020-06-16 14:45 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c635e965-6b78-436a-3959-e4777e1732c1@gmail.com \
    --to=kohada.t2@gmail.com \
    --cc=kohada.tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mori.takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
    --cc=motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3] exfat: remove EXFAT_SB_DIRTY flag' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).