LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao.yu@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:19:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <014d1b9d-0698-fda1-0765-cce81d915280@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPYjzAVq04LfUO2Y@google.com>
On 2021/7/20 9:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Wasn't it supposed to be v1?
I skip IPU case for v1, and resend it as v3, is it fine to you?
Thanks,
>
> On 07/20, Chao Yu wrote:
>> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15126.html
>>
>> As [1] reported, if lower device doesn't support write barrier, in below
>> case:
>>
>> - write page #0; persist
>> - overwrite page #0
>> - fsync
>> - write data page #0 OPU into device's cache
>> - write inode page into device's cache
>> - issue flush
>>
>> If SPO is triggered during flush command, inode page can be persisted
>> before data page #0, so that after recovery, inode page can be recovered
>> with new physical block address of data page #0, however there may
>> contains dummy data in new physical block address.
>>
>> Then what user will see is: after overwrite & fsync + SPO, old data in
>> file was corrupted, if any user do care about such case, we can suggest
>> user to use STRICT fsync mode, in this mode, we will force to use atomic
>> write sematics to keep write order in between data/node and last node,
>> so that it avoids potential data corruption during fsync().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> index 6afd4562335f..00b45876eaa1 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> @@ -301,6 +301,18 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
>> f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO))
>> goto flush_out;
>> goto out;
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * for OPU case, during fsync(), node can be persisted before
>> + * data when lower device doesn't support write barrier, result
>> + * in data corruption after SPO.
>> + * So for strict fsync mode, force to use atomic write sematics
>> + * to keep write order in between data/node and last node to
>> + * avoid potential data corruption.
>> + */
>> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode ==
>> + FSYNC_MODE_STRICT && !atomic)
>> + atomic = true;
>> }
>> go_write:
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.22.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-20 1:03 Chao Yu
2021-07-20 1:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-20 1:19 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2021-07-29 1:41 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-07-30 22:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=014d1b9d-0698-fda1-0765-cce81d915280@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=chao.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).