LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Norman Diamond" <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: [patch] kill off PC9800
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 16:35:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <035e01c43b18$69ede9f0$b7ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> (raw)

Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Randy.Dunlap" <> wrote:
> >
> >  PC9800 sub-arch is incomplete, hackish (at least in IDE), maintainers
> >  don't reply to emails and haven't touched it in awhile.
> And the hardware is obsolete, isn't it?  Does anyone know when they were
> last manufactured, and how popular they are?

Of course they aren't popular any more, but the last ones were still
respectably powerful and can run stuff like Windows 2000 Server.

When were PowerPC, MIPS (other than embedded), and Alpha chips last
manufactured, and how popular are they?

[By the way the above commendts do not reflect my personal opinion.  A few
years ago a friend got one free.  It wasn't one of the last and repectably
powerful ones, it had a 486 and 10MB of RAM.  It was amazingly hard to get
Windows 95 installed onto it, because I had no experience with the
architecture (other than having read a few things such as hard disk
partitions being DOS letters A, B, and then presumably E and upwards, and it
turned out that this wasn't true when booting from a floppy, and the PC98
version of Windows 95 confused itself too when doing its normal reboots from
the hard disk part way through installation...).  After being installed,
Windows 95 ran impressively well in 10MB of RAM.  The GUI responded to mouse
clicks immediately, none of the sluggishness normally associated with X11
Windows and XP Windows.  Even opening a document in WordPad came up without
waiting.  However, the installation process was so painful that I told my
friend my opinion of his computer.  Even when he got it free, it was worth
less than he paid for it.]

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-16  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-16  7:35 Norman Diamond [this message]
2004-05-16 16:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-17 21:38   ` Norman Diamond
2004-05-17 21:51     ` Roland Dreier
2004-05-17 21:59       ` Norman Diamond
2004-05-17 22:33         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-18  1:04         ` viro
2004-05-17 22:17       ` Joel Jaeggli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-16 17:50 James Bottomley
2004-05-16 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-16 21:28   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-16 21:38     ` James Bottomley
2004-05-17 17:15       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-18 20:14   ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-18 20:23     ` Brian Gerst
2004-05-18 20:53       ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-18 21:14         ` James Bottomley
2004-05-16  6:21 Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-16  6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-16 16:16   ` GOTO Masanori
2004-05-16 17:25     ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='035e01c43b18$69ede9f0$b7ee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60' \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [patch] kill off PC9800' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).