LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Srinivas Rao L <lsrao@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: Avoid calls to cpuidle_resume|pause() for s2idle Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:52:08 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <07e6821c-c221-e90d-c977-4d6b55c1ab8d@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210929144451.113334-2-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Hi, On 9/29/2021 8:14 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > In s2idle_enter(), cpuidle_resume|pause() are invoked to re-allow calls to > the cpuidle callbacks during s2idle operations. This is needed because > cpuidle is paused in-between in dpm_suspend_noirq() and dpm_resume_noirq(). > > However, calling cpuidle_resume|pause() from s2idle_enter() looks a bit > superfluous, as it also causes all CPUs to be waken up when the first CPU > wakes up from s2idle. Thanks for the patch. This can be good optimization to avoid waking up all CPUs always. > > Therefore, let's drop the calls to cpuidle_resume|pause() from > s2idle_enter(). To make this work, let's also adopt the path in the > cpuidle_idle_call() to allow cpuidle callbacks to be invoked for s2idle, > even if cpuidle has been paused. > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 7 ++++++- > include/linux/cpuidle.h | 2 ++ > kernel/power/suspend.c | 2 -- > kernel/sched/idle.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > index ef2ea1b12cd8..c76747e497e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > @@ -49,7 +49,12 @@ void disable_cpuidle(void) > bool cpuidle_not_available(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > struct cpuidle_device *dev) > { > - return off || !initialized || !drv || !dev || !dev->enabled; > + return off || !drv || !dev || !dev->enabled; > +} > + > +bool cpuidle_paused(void) > +{ > + return !initialized; > } > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h > index fce476275e16..51698b385ab5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h > @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ extern void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void); > extern void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void); > extern void cpuidle_pause(void); > extern void cpuidle_resume(void); > +extern bool cpuidle_paused(void); > extern int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev); > extern void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev); > extern int cpuidle_play_dead(void); > @@ -204,6 +205,7 @@ static inline void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void) { } > static inline void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void) { } > static inline void cpuidle_pause(void) { } > static inline void cpuidle_resume(void) { } > +static inline bool cpuidle_paused(void) {return true; } > static inline int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev) > {return -ENODEV; } > static inline void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev) { } > diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c > index eb75f394a059..388a5de4836e 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/suspend.c > +++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c > @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ static void s2idle_enter(void) > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&s2idle_lock); > > cpus_read_lock(); > - cpuidle_resume(); > > /* Push all the CPUs into the idle loop. */ > wake_up_all_idle_cpus(); wake_up_all_idle_cpus() will still cause all CPUs to be woken up when first cpu wakes up. say for example, 1. device goes to s2idle suspend. 2. one CPU wakes up to handle irq (irq is not a wake irq but left enabled at GIC because of IRQF_NOSUSPEND flag) so such irq will not break suspend. 3. The cpu handles the irq. 4. same cpu don't break s2idle_loop() and goes to s2idle_enter() where it wakes up all existing idle cpus due to wake_up_all_idle_cpus() 5. all of CPUs again enter s2idle. to avoid waking up all CPUs in above case, something like below snip may help (i have not tested yet), when CPUs are in s2idle_loop(), 1. set the s2idle state to enter. 2. wake up all cpus from shallow state, so that they can re-enter deepest state. 3. Forever loop until a break with some wake irq. 4. clear the s2idle state. 5. wake up all cpus from deepest state so that they can now stay in shallow state/running state. void s2idle_loop(void) { + s2idle_state = S2IDLE_STATE_ENTER; + /* Push all the CPUs to enter deepest available state */ + wake_up_all_idle_cpus(); for (;;) { if (s2idle_ops && s2idle_ops->wake) { if (s2idle_ops->wake()) .. s2idle_enter(); } + s2idle_state = S2IDLE_STATE_NONE; + /* Push all the CPUs to enter default_idle() from this point */ + wake_up_all_idle_cpus(); } Thanks, Maulik > @@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void s2idle_enter(void) > swait_event_exclusive(s2idle_wait_head, > s2idle_state == S2IDLE_STATE_WAKE); > > - cpuidle_pause(); > cpus_read_unlock(); > > raw_spin_lock_irq(&s2idle_lock); > diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c > index d17b0a5ce6ac..3bc3a2c46731 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c > @@ -158,6 +158,17 @@ static int call_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev, > return cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state); > } > > +static void cpuidle_deepest_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > + struct cpuidle_device *dev, > + u64 max_latency_ns) > +{ > + int next_state; > + > + tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(); > + next_state = cpuidle_find_deepest_state(drv, dev, max_latency_ns); > + call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state); > +} > + > /** > * cpuidle_idle_call - the main idle function > * > @@ -189,6 +200,7 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void) > */ > > if (cpuidle_not_available(drv, dev)) { > +default_idle: > tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(); > > default_idle_call(); > @@ -204,25 +216,19 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void) > * timekeeping to prevent timer interrupts from kicking us out of idle > * until a proper wakeup interrupt happens. > */ > + if (idle_should_enter_s2idle()) { > + entered_state = call_cpuidle_s2idle(drv, dev); > + if (entered_state <= 0) > + cpuidle_deepest_state(drv, dev, U64_MAX); > + goto exit_idle; > + } > > - if (idle_should_enter_s2idle() || dev->forced_idle_latency_limit_ns) { > - u64 max_latency_ns; > - > - if (idle_should_enter_s2idle()) { > - > - entered_state = call_cpuidle_s2idle(drv, dev); > - if (entered_state > 0) > - goto exit_idle; > - > - max_latency_ns = U64_MAX; > - } else { > - max_latency_ns = dev->forced_idle_latency_limit_ns; > - } > - > - tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(); > + if (cpuidle_paused()) > + goto default_idle; > > - next_state = cpuidle_find_deepest_state(drv, dev, max_latency_ns); > - call_cpuidle(drv, dev, next_state); > + if (dev->forced_idle_latency_limit_ns) { > + cpuidle_deepest_state(drv, dev, > + dev->forced_idle_latency_limit_ns); > } else { > bool stop_tick = true; > > -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-06 10:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-29 14:44 [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle: Fix runtime PM based cpuidle for s2idle Ulf Hansson 2021-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: Avoid calls to cpuidle_resume|pause() " Ulf Hansson 2021-10-06 10:22 ` Maulik Shah [this message] 2021-10-06 13:10 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-09 15:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-09 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-11 10:04 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM: sleep: Fix runtime PM based cpuidle support Ulf Hansson 2021-10-06 10:28 ` Maulik Shah 2021-10-20 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 11:48 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 13:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 14:04 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 15:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 16:28 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 16:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 17:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 18:49 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 18:36 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 16:16 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 16:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 18:11 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-21 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-21 19:56 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-22 9:15 ` Maulik Shah 2021-10-22 10:18 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-22 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2021-10-22 12:56 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-10-22 13:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=07e6821c-c221-e90d-c977-4d6b55c1ab8d@codeaurora.org \ --to=mkshah@codeaurora.org \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=len.brown@intel.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lsrao@codeaurora.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).