LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase the amount of defense before computing vblank timestamps
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:01:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d30dc$> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:18:53 +0000, Chris Clayton <> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 January 2011, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <>
> > ---
> >
> > Chris, does this help?
> >
> Sorry Chris, X still doesn't start with this patch applied. The symptoms are 
> slightly different in that the monitor doesn't go into power saving mode, but 
> the screen is still black and I have to recycle the power to get the machine 
> back.
> The messages in the log file has changed though.We now have:

Despite appearances to the contrary, it is a step forward. We have the
crash under control, and now need to tackle the underlying problem.

However, I'm worried by the fact that no CRTCs are attached. Is this not
using KMS?
> > If you can convert the address to a line number that would pinpoint the
> Not done that before and nothing jumped out of my search on google, so how do I 
> go about getting the line number for you, please?

Something like:

$ gdb drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko
(gdb) list *drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x3e

should do the trick (if compiled as a module, vmlinux otherwise)

Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-22 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
2011-01-22 10:11 ` Chris Wilson
2011-01-22 11:18   ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-22 18:01     ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2011-01-23  8:56       ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-23  9:32         ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-23 10:50           ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Disable high-precision vblank timestamping for UMS Chris Wilson
2011-01-23 11:28             ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-23 12:44               ` Chris Wilson
2011-01-23 12:55                 ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-23 13:06               ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle the no-interrupts case for UMS by polling Chris Wilson
2011-01-23 15:38                 ` Chris Clayton
2011-01-23 15:59                   ` Chris Wilson
2011-02-10 19:58                     ` Chris Clayton
2011-02-10 20:37                       ` Chris Wilson
2011-01-23 10:52           ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase the amount of defense before computing vblank timestamps Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='0d30dc$' \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase the amount of defense before computing vblank timestamps' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).