From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261981AbUEVXYu (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 19:24:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261984AbUEVXYu (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 19:24:50 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:32984 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261981AbUEVXYt (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 19:24:49 -0400 Subject: Re: protecting source code in 2.6 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Vincent C Jones Cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, Linux Kernel list In-Reply-To: <20040522145421.1585F16679@x23.networkingunlimited.com> References: <1XVMB-8tQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <20040522145421.1585F16679@x23.networkingunlimited.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1085268253.9234.14.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:24:14 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Arguments tend to loose a lot of their impact when based on religion > rather than realism. OK, then please, provide us with a strong & valid argument justifying the interest in keeping a driver closed. Oh, and ATI or nVidia aren't good examples, just grep for the amount of crashes caused by the later for example, look some of the backtraces and see the horror... Ben.