LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	tony.luck@intel.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:14:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171268065.6308.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45D025BF.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 07:30 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > >     [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
> > >     
> > >     Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments other than IA64
> > >     and EM64T, namely for Xen.
> > 
> > Tony, this code is more than ugly, and even further not needed for anything
> > we actually need.  Can you please revert it.
> > 
> > Some comments below in case we need justification..
> > 
> > If Jan actually had a goal with that except making the code utterly
> > unreadable he should try again with small patches that are well
> > explained and do one thing at a at time.  (And cane be reviewed an
> > improved on if needed.
> 
> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. 

Xen the linux guest
or
Xen the hypervisor?

if it's the later, why on earth would we want to uglyfy linux for it?
(arguably it holds in the former case as well)



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-12  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200702070759.l177xIti030295@hera.kernel.org>
2007-02-07  8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-11  7:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-12  7:30     ` Jan Beulich
2007-02-12  8:14       ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2007-02-12  8:56         ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2007-02-12  8:58         ` Jan Beulich
2007-02-12 17:12       ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-13  7:27         ` Jan Beulich
2007-02-13  7:53           ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1171268065.6308.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).