LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Cc: "Hack inc." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, autofs@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:52:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171327959.3377.3.camel@raven.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070212135749.GA1681@dspnet.fr.eu.org>

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:57 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:43:14PM +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 11:33 +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 19:18 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:07:41AM +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > It may be better to update to a later kernel so I don't have to port the
> > > > > patch to several different kernels. Is that possible?
> > > > 
> > > > Sure, 2.6.20 or -git?
> > > 
> > > 2.6.20 has all the patches I've proposed so far except for the one we're
> > > working on so that would be best for me.
> > > 
> > > Seems there may still be a problem with the patch so I'll let you know
> > > what's happening as soon as I can.
> > 
> > I think I'm just about done.
> > 
> > Could you try using the two patches here against 2.6.20 please:
> 
> The patch works beautifully, no more failures with my test rig, until
> the point where the kernel crashes.  Since the crashes happen without
> the patch too, you're off the hook, but that means I can't deploy it
> for harsher testing yet.
> 
> No wonder Dave Jones is prudent about updating kernels in fc :-)

Indeed.
Which kernel can you use?
I believe that 2200 had another problem so can you use an fc5 kernel
later than that?

Ian



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-13  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-07 17:34 Olivier Galibert
2007-02-07 18:07 ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2007-02-07 18:18   ` Olivier Galibert
2007-02-08  2:33     ` Ian Kent
2007-02-12  6:43       ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ian Kent
2007-02-12  6:46         ` [PATCH 2/2] " Ian Kent
2007-02-12 13:57         ` [PATCH 1/2] " Olivier Galibert
2007-02-13  0:52           ` Ian Kent [this message]
2007-02-13  8:50             ` Olivier Galibert
2007-02-13 13:40               ` Ian Kent
2007-02-13 14:07               ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-13 15:54                 ` Olivier Galibert
2007-02-13 15:57                   ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-13 17:35                   ` Ian Kent
2007-02-13 20:43                     ` Olivier Galibert
2007-02-13 17:29                 ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1171327959.3377.3.camel@raven.themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] Re: [autofs] Bad race condition in the new autofs protocol somewhere' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).