LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Rose <>
To: Jan-Bernd Themann <>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <>,
	Christoph Raisch <>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <>,
	linux-kernel <>,
	linux-ppc <>,
	Marcus Eder <>, Thomas Klein <>,, netdev <>,
	Nathan Fontenot <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] ehea: dynamic add / remove port
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:51:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>


Sounds good.  A couple of questions/comments:

> I think it is not necessary to have a special entry/kobject for each logical
> port. I suggest we use SET_NETDEV_DEV to create links to all ethernet devices
> that represent each a logical port. This should be in sync with all other 
> ethernet drivers. Port attributes like the "logical port id" that might be 
> need by the userspace application can be added to the net:ethX entry
> (link created with SET_NETDEV_DEV) as additional attributes. 

As we develop the userspace tool, we are finding a need to know the
following for each logical port:

1) the linux interface/device (a symlink would do this)
2) the logical port number - were you suggesting communicating this
through the name of the symlink, or in the directory of the symlink
3) the open firmware path for the logical port.  This is typically
communicated through a sysfs attribute file "devspec", but we can't do
this without a new kobject for the port.

> > 
> > Second, the probe and remove functions do not communicate whether an add
> > or remove was successful.  Combine this with the lack of port
> > information in the adapter sysfs directory, and the userspace tool has
> > no way of verifying a dynamic add/remove.
> True. I suggest we return error codes (-EIO / -EINVAL) in case the adding
> or removing of ports fails. This is possible as we know instantly if the
> operation failed or not. It is a synchronus operation.

Sounds good.


      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-14 14:36 Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-02-14 22:25 ` John Rose
2007-02-15 17:04   ` John Rose
2007-02-16 15:06   ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-02-16 15:51     ` John Rose [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rc1] ehea: dynamic add / remove port' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).