From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1751978AbXBVWH4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751978AbXBVWH4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:07:56 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751976AbXBVWH4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:07:56 -0500
Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:45519 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751969AbXBVWHz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:07:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, mike.miller@hp.com,
       jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@novell.com
In-Reply-To: <20070222220225.GC14162@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
References: <20070221211039.GA2672@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
	 <20070221191427.9b7cf4b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	 <20070222165123.GC2672@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
	 <20070222132434.d84d3248.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	 <1172180484.3378.34.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
	 <20070222220225.GC14162@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:06:41 -0600
Message-Id: <1172182001.3378.38.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 16:02 -0600, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> Will this patch for my patch work for now?

Yes, I think that should be fine ... it's only a theoretical worry; at
the moment sector_t is unsigned ... but just in case.

James