From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030321AbXCPXh4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:37:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030333AbXCPXh4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:37:56 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:36948 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030321AbXCPXhy (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:37:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.21-rc1,2,3 regressions on my system that I found so far From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , Arjan van de Ven , Len Brown In-Reply-To: <200703161230.03712.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> References: <200703161230.03712.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:44:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1174088686.13341.347.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Maxim, On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:30 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > 3) Sometimes I get this (once in three boots or so) > > [ 36.217405] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs > [ 36.217587] ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 > [ 36.433917] APIC timer disabled due to verification failure. > > And NO_HZ is disabled due to that (I get 1000/s timer's interrupts) > I haven't investigated that yet. > It looks like another new test that my hardware fails to perform... Yes, this is probably caused by SMM code trying to emulate a PS/2 keyboard from a (maybe connected or not) USB keyboard. Unfortunately we have no way to disable this BIOS misfeature in the early boot process. Arjan, Len ????? I built in this test to rule out bogus LAPIC timer calibration values which are sometimes off by factor 2-10. But I also built in a calibration against the PM-Timer, which turned out to be quite reliable and I think the additional verification step is only necessary for sytems without PM-Timer. That was a bit over cautious from my side. I send a patch to avoid this when PM-Timer is available in a separate mail. tglx