LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu@analog.com, Bryan <bryan.wu@analog.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:24:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174530291.20061.9.camel@roc-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070321155324.a7d2d75a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:19:23 +0800
> "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com> wrote:
> 
> > 1) Some issues are fixed according to LKML patch review.
> > 2) Remove not supported BF535 code
> > 3) Fixed some bugs from blackfin.uclinux.org SVN update
> > Here is the updated patch for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1
> 
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/cplbinit.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h.rej
> 
> This seems to be against a kernel which did not include
> blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch.  But 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 did
> include blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch, so I'm not sure
> what is going on here.
> 

Sorry for this mess up. you know, as
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch was posted, it was
applied to our SVN tree. And I just merged these weeks SVN change to
this update patch. So this patch includes
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch. 

Please hold on, after I fixed some issues according to Arnd and Paul's
latest review, a new update patch will be sent.

Sorry for send a all-in-one update patch. Arnd and Paul gave lots' of
good ideas about our last blackfin-arch.patch last time, and most of
their request are applied in this days. So if I split the all-in-one
update patch to small fix, there will be maybe 20 or 30 patches.

After this blackfin-arch-update.patch was merged to -mm, I will post
small fixed patches as Arnd's advise.

Thanks
-Bryan Wu

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-22  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1174472363.5648.58.camel@roc-desktop>
2007-03-21 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22  2:24   ` Wu, Bryan [this message]
2007-03-22  4:08     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22  5:47       ` Wu, Bryan
     [not found] <1174471618.5648.50.camel@roc-desktop>
2007-03-21 10:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-21 10:33   ` Wu, Bryan
2007-03-21 10:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-21 12:56 ` Paul Mundt
2007-03-21 15:39   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-03-21 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1174530291.20061.9.camel@roc-desktop \
    --to=bryan.wu@analog.com \
    --cc=Wu@analog.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).