From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161173AbXCVWbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:31:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161172AbXCVWbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:31:34 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:40429 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161169AbXCVWbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:31:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] MSI rework From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Greg KH Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael Ellerman , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , daniel.e.wolstenholme@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20070322220837.GD20713@kroah.com> References: <1174560686.307511.956605711793.qpush@cradle> <20070322190834.GA14802@kroah.com> <1174600936.10836.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070322220837.GD20713@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:31:15 +1100 Message-Id: <1174602675.10836.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Ok, then which patches in the series should be acceptable to take right > now for 2.6.22? The "clean up the BUG" ones? I'd say 1...8 (BUG cleanups and removing msi_cache) looks to be on the safe side to me, though of course, some review by Eric & a bit of testing would be welcome regardless :-) The others could go into -mm right away I suppose (or rather as soon as Eric gets a chance to verify they don't break his test setups as I think he can test MSI-X) and we can pour them into mainline one by one if necessary as they get hammered / verified. Cheers, Ben.