LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@yahoo.gr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:46:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175273215.7185.3.camel@Homer.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <325618.89505.qm@web26701.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:05 +0000, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
> Cc: linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>; Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM
> Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
>
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > * Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm cautiously optimistic that we're at the thin edge of the bugfix
> > > wedge now.
> [...]
>
> > and the numbers he posted:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117448900626028&w=2
>
> We been staring at these numbers for while now and we come to the conclusion they wrong.
>
> The test is f is 3 tasks, two on different and one on same cpu as sh here:
> virgin 2.6.21-rc3-rsdl-smp
> top - 13:52:50 up 7 min, 12 users, load average: 3.45, 2.89, 1.51
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ P COMMAND
> 6560 root 31 0 2892 1236 1032 R 82 0.1 1:50.24 1 sh
> 6558 root 28 0 1428 276 228 S 42 0.0 1:00.09 1 f
> 6557 root 30 0 1424 280 228 R 35 0.0 1:00.25 0 f
> 6559 root 39 0 1424 276 228 R 33 0.0 0:58.36 0 f
This is a 1 second sample, tasks migrate.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-30 15:05 [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-30 16:46 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2007-03-31 2:36 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 3:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 3:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:41 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 6:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 9:28 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 9:48 ` [patch] sched: improve fairness, v3 Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:05 ` [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 2:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 5:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:04 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-29 11:22 Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 1:07 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1175273215.7185.3.camel@Homer.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=xantidides@yahoo.gr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).