From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751185AbXCaGbt (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:31:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752209AbXCaGbt (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:31:49 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51949 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751185AbXCaGbs (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:31:48 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18wv74X2Zkwn4incSWXkjVlojJJgjC19eEE5AOP8w CDkfSajaObDoup Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL From: Mike Galbraith To: Xenofon Antidides Cc: Ingo Molnar , Con Kolivas , linux list , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <834572.46808.qm@web26713.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <834572.46808.qm@web26713.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:31:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1175322706.6030.20.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote: > Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD. Shrug. My milage is different, but hey, it's a work in progress. If SD ever gets to the point that it actually delivers what it claims, I may join you. In the meantime, IMHO mainline is MUCH better in the general case. If the general case was that which the various sleep exploits do, the history mechanism in mainline wouldn't have survived it's first day. -Mike