LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@yahoo.gr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:49:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175323786.6030.28.camel@Homer.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175322706.6030.20.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 08:31 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
>
> > Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
General comment directed at nobody in particular:
If anyone thinks the current scheduler sucks rocks, maybe they should
try to fix it. If they think SD is the best thing since sliced bread,
maybe they should help Con fix that. Code talks...
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-31 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-30 15:05 [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-30 16:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 2:36 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 3:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 3:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:41 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 6:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:49 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2007-03-31 9:28 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 9:48 ` [patch] sched: improve fairness, v3 Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:05 ` [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 2:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 5:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:04 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-29 11:22 Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 1:07 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1175323786.6030.28.camel@Homer.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=xantidides@yahoo.gr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).