LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Amsden <>
To: Alan Cox <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no _p
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:22:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:14 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> I can find no reason for the _p on the serverworks IRQ routing logic, and
> a review of the documentation contains no indication that any such delay
> is needed so lets try this

Looks good to me; unfortunately my Serverworks boxes got upgraded so I
can't test, but install base is really big.

Acked-by: Zachary Amsden <>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-11 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-11 18:14 Alan Cox
2008-01-11 23:22 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2008-01-14 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no _p' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).