From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753095AbYANNak (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:30:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750808AbYANNab (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:30:31 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:13118 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbYANNaa (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:30:30 -0500 X-SBRS: None X-MesageID: 37625939 X-Ironport-Server: ftlpip02.citrite.net X-Remote-IP: 216.142.71.134 X-Policy: $Relay X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,282,1196658000"; d="scan'208";a="37625939" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kexec/i386: kexec page table code clean up - add arch_kimage From: Ian Campbell To: Simon Horman Cc: Vivek Goyal , "Huang, Ying" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm In-Reply-To: <20080110081535.GA30505@verge.net.au> References: <1199847467.8126.15.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20080110011423.GB23143@redhat.com> <20080110081535.GA30505@verge.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:29:36 +0000 Message-Id: <1200317376.11020.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 17:15 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Have you tested Xen too? Does it run into issues with this change? > > Xen will need to be updated for this change but it shouldn't be a big > deal. Basically right now it calls __ma() (which is kind of like __pa()) > on kexec_pgd and friends. Updating the arguments to __ma() to use > the new arch_kimage pointers should be easy enough. I think you mean the Xen specific parts of the kexec machinery in the kernel.c would need updating rather than the hypervisor, right? I don't think these changes will cause anything more than minor problems for whoever ports the Xen kexec stuff upstream. > N.B: As this is Dom0 code (not DomU) it is maintained in the xen > repository and has been merged into Linux. I don't think we would bother backporting these changes to there, would we? Ian.