LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marcin.slusarz@gmail.com
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks
Date: Sun,  3 Feb 2008 19:36:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202063771-18172-2-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202063771-18172-1-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>

block cannot be less than 0, because it's sector_t,
so remove unneeded checks

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/udf/inode.c |   12 ------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index c2d0477..531443d 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -323,9 +323,6 @@ static int udf_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
 
 	lock_kernel();
 
-	if (block < 0)
-		goto abort_negative;
-
 	iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
 	if (block == iinfo->i_next_alloc_block + 1) {
 		iinfo->i_next_alloc_block++;
@@ -347,10 +344,6 @@ static int udf_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
 abort:
 	unlock_kernel();
 	return err;
-
-abort_negative:
-	udf_warning(inode->i_sb, "udf_get_block", "block < 0");
-	goto abort;
 }
 
 static struct buffer_head *udf_getblk(struct inode *inode, long block,
@@ -2081,11 +2074,6 @@ int8_t inode_bmap(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
 	int8_t etype;
 	struct udf_inode_info *iinfo;
 
-	if (block < 0) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "udf: inode_bmap: block < 0\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
-
 	iinfo = UDF_I(inode);
 	pos->offset = 0;
 	pos->block = iinfo->i_location;
-- 
1.5.3.7


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-03 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-03 18:36 [PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups marcin.slusarz
2008-02-03 18:36 ` marcin.slusarz [this message]
2008-02-05 15:30   ` [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks Jan Kara
2008-02-03 18:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] udf: create function for conversion from timestamp to timespec marcin.slusarz
2008-02-05 15:32   ` Jan Kara
2008-02-03 18:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec marcin.slusarz
2008-02-05 15:48   ` Jan Kara
2008-02-05 19:12     ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-06 13:25       ` Jan Kara
2008-02-03 18:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps marcin.slusarz
2008-02-05 15:59   ` Jan Kara
2008-02-05 19:21     ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-06 11:10       ` Jan Kara
2008-02-10 10:25         ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-03 18:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type marcin.slusarz
2008-02-05 16:01   ` Jan Kara
2008-02-10 10:29     ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-03 18:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-05 16:22   ` Jan Kara
2008-02-05 19:34     ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-02-06 11:09       ` Jan Kara
2008-02-10 10:33         ` Marcin Slusarz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1202063771-18172-2-git-send-email-marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
    --to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/6] udf: udf_get_block, inode_bmap - remove unneeded checks' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).