LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:01:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202335261.6274.11.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802062250.07758.rjw@sisk.pl>


On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 22:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Well, that whole queue.
> 
> It doesn't compile for me.

I did solve some compile issues since posting, Ingo should have the
compiling version in sched-devel soonish (don't know if he pushed it
already).

> > Your test program just failed to obtain realtime scheduling
> 
> Well, it shouldn't.  The expected result is to obtain realtime scheduling
> or we will break existing setups.

Thats a case of wrong expectations in my book. You enabled group
scheduling and hence behaviour changes. There is just nothing much one
can do about it, if you don't assign bandwidth to a group, it won't be
able to run anything. Better to refuse to run, than to sit idle, right?

But I appreciate the situation, therefore I made the whole rt-group
scheduling a separate .config option (which defaults to n)


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-06 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-01  1:37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01  2:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01  7:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-01  9:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-01 11:50       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 12:09         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-01 23:39           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-05 21:46             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-02-06  1:21               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found] ` <b647ffbd0802060040wbfe16afq4355e8f4f31ab06b@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <1202288548.19243.47.camel@lappy>
2008-02-06 18:25     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-06 21:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-06 21:50         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-06 22:01           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-02-06 22:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-06 22:34               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-06 23:31                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-06 23:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-07 19:53                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-07 21:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-10 12:30                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1202335261.6274.11.camel@lappy \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --subject='Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).