From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762392AbYBLNFS (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:05:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757046AbYBLNFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:05:05 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:35265 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755933AbYBLNFD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:05:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: fair-group: load_balance_monitor vs wakeups From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arjan van de Ven , vatsa , Dhaval Giani , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1202821178.6247.21.camel@lappy> References: <1202821178.6247.21.camel@lappy> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:04:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1202821482.6247.23.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 13:59 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > + printk(KERN_EMERG "load_balance_shares: %p %d\n", lb_monitor, state); Uhm,.. seems I forgot to refresh after removing the debug info.. :-)