LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	torvalds@osdl.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix left over EFI cache mapping problems
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:52:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203043953.30010.14.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080214183819.GA19846@elte.hu>

On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 19:38 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > > this is indeed a bug (we change the attributes for a larger area 
> > > than needed), but your fix is unclean. Find below a cleaner 
> > > solution.
> > 
> > You're still ignoring the other problem of set_memory_uc() not 
> > handling fixmap and ioremap correctly. [...]
> 
> No, we did not ignore it, and yes, you are wrong.
> 
> One thing that you miss is that the 64-bit EFI runtime has to be marked 
> uncacheable only if it the EFI image attribute signals an uncacheable 
> area:
> 
>                 if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
>                         set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, md->num_pages);
> 
> and Linux EFI does not support device EFI runtimes. So your observation, 
> while correct for non-RAM 64-bit EFI images, is theoretical at the 
> moment and has no practical relevance.

On my test machine, there is EFI runtime memory area with EFI_MEMORY_UC
attribute. The following is cut from the dmesg:

EFI: mem75: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000007f4ff000-0x000000007f500000) (0MB)
EFI: mem76: type=11, attr=0x8000000000000001, range=[0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed20000) (0MB)
EFI: mem77: type=11, attr=0x8000000000000001, range=[0x00000000fffb0000-0x00000000fffb4000) (0MB)

Where:

attr is md->attribute,
#define EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME 0x8000000000000000
#define EFI_MEMORY_UC 0x0000000000000001

But because end_pfn_map contains the above UC memory area, efi_ioremap()
is not used on EFI 64.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-15  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-14 13:13 Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 17:16   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 18:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 21:42       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 22:08         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-14 23:01           ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15  2:52       ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2008-02-15  8:55         ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15  9:16           ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15  4:48   ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15  5:44     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-15  6:24       ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15  7:30       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15  7:08     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15  7:32       ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-18  1:53       ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-18 11:26         ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 14:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15  8:48     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15  9:21       ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15  9:43         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203043953.30010.14.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Fix left over EFI cache mapping problems' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).