LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 10/17] Unionfs: factor out revalidation routine
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:57:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203217051613-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12032170461107-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>

To be used by rest of revalidation code, as well a callers who already
locked the child and parent dentry branch-configurations.

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
---
 fs/unionfs/dentry.c |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 fs/unionfs/union.h  |    3 ++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index afa2120..3bd2dfb 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -285,6 +285,59 @@ void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Revalidate a single file/symlink/special dentry.  Assume that info nodes
+ * of the dentry and its parent are locked.  Assume that parent(s) are all
+ * valid already, but the child may not yet be valid.  Returns true if
+ * valid, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one_locked(struct dentry *dentry,
+				       struct nameidata *nd,
+				       bool willwrite)
+{
+	bool valid = false;	/* default is invalid */
+	int sbgen, dgen, bindex;
+
+	verify_locked(dentry);
+	verify_locked(dentry->d_parent);
+
+	sbgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->generation);
+	dgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation);
+
+	if (unlikely(is_newer_lower(dentry))) {
+		/* root dentry special case as aforementioned */
+		if (IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
+			unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_inode);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * reset generation number to zero, guaranteed to be
+			 * "old"
+			 */
+			dgen = 0;
+			atomic_set(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation, dgen);
+		}
+		if (!willwrite)
+			purge_inode_data(dentry->d_inode);
+	}
+	valid = __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(dentry, nd);
+
+	/*
+	 * If __unionfs_d_revalidate_one() succeeded above, then it will
+	 * have incremented the refcnt of the mnt's, but also the branch
+	 * indices of the dentry will have been updated (to take into
+	 * account any branch insertions/deletion.  So the current
+	 * dbstart/dbend match the current, and new, indices of the mnts
+	 * which __unionfs_d_revalidate_one has incremented.  Note: the "if"
+	 * test below does not depend on whether chain_len was 0 or greater.
+	 */
+	if (!valid || sbgen == dgen)
+		goto out;
+	for (bindex = dbstart(dentry); bindex <= dbend(dentry); bindex++)
+		unionfs_mntput(dentry, bindex);
+out:
+	return valid;
+}
+
+/*
  * Revalidate a parent chain of dentries, then the actual node.
  * Assumes that dentry is locked, but will lock all parents if/when needed.
  *
@@ -404,42 +457,10 @@ out_this:
 	if (dentry != dentry->d_parent)
 		unionfs_lock_dentry(dentry->d_parent,
 				    UNIONFS_DMUTEX_REVAL_PARENT);
-	dgen = atomic_read(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation);
-
-	if (unlikely(is_newer_lower(dentry))) {
-		/* root dentry special case as aforementioned */
-		if (IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
-			unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_inode);
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * reset generation number to zero, guaranteed to be
-			 * "old"
-			 */
-			dgen = 0;
-			atomic_set(&UNIONFS_D(dentry)->generation, dgen);
-		}
-		if (!willwrite)
-			purge_inode_data(dentry->d_inode);
-	}
-	valid = __unionfs_d_revalidate_one(dentry, nd);
+	valid = __unionfs_d_revalidate_one_locked(dentry, nd, willwrite);
 	if (dentry != dentry->d_parent)
 		unionfs_unlock_dentry(dentry->d_parent);
 
-	/*
-	 * If __unionfs_d_revalidate_one() succeeded above, then it will
-	 * have incremented the refcnt of the mnt's, but also the branch
-	 * indices of the dentry will have been updated (to take into
-	 * account any branch insertions/deletion.  So the current
-	 * dbstart/dbend match the current, and new, indices of the mnts
-	 * which __unionfs_d_revalidate_one has incremented.  Note: the "if"
-	 * test below does not depend on whether chain_len was 0 or greater.
-	 */
-	if (valid && sbgen != dgen)
-		for (bindex = dbstart(dentry);
-		     bindex <= dbend(dentry);
-		     bindex++)
-			unionfs_mntput(dentry, bindex);
-
 out_free:
 	/* unlock/dput all dentries in chain and return status */
 	if (chain_len > 0) {
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/union.h b/fs/unionfs/union.h
index 0e0ccde..5001b07 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/union.h
+++ b/fs/unionfs/union.h
@@ -368,6 +368,9 @@ extern int unionfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 extern int unionfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry);
 extern int unionfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry);
 
+extern bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_one_locked(struct dentry *dentry,
+					      struct nameidata *nd,
+					      bool willwrite);
 extern bool __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry,
 					 struct nameidata *nd, bool willwrite);
 extern bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry);
-- 
1.5.2.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-17  3:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-17  2:57 [GIT PULL -mm] 00/17 Unionfs updates/fixes/cleanups Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 01/17] Unionfs: grab lower super_block references Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 02/17] Unionfs: ensure consistent lower inodes types Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 03/17] Unionfs: document behavior when the lower topology changes Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 04/17] Unionfs: uninline unionfs_copy_attr_times and unionfs_copy_attr_all Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 05/17] Unionfs: initialize path_save variable Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 06/17] Unionfs: extend dentry branch configuration lock in open Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 07/17] Unionfs: follow_link locking fixes Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 08/17] Unionfs: improve debugging in copy_attr_times Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 09/17] Unionfs: revalidation code cleanup and refactoring Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` Erez Zadok [this message]
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 11/17] Unionfs: lock parents' branch configuration fixes Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 12/17] Unionfs: branch management/configuration fixes Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 13/17] Unionfs: use dget_parent in revalidation code Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] Unionfs: stop using iget() and read_inode() Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 15/17] Unionfs: embed a struct path into struct nameidata instead of nd dentrymnt Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 16/17] Unionfs: use the new path_put Erez Zadok
2008-02-17  2:57 ` [PATCH 17/17] VFS/Unionfs: use generic path_get/path_put functions Erez Zadok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203217051613-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
    --to=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 10/17] Unionfs: factor out revalidation routine' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).