LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:38:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203320304.26269.3.camel@homer.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218042831.GJ30201@elte.hu>


On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 05:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: 
> * Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:25:51PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > > The patch is against 2.6.25-rc1. I would request you to check for
> > > difference it makes with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED and
> > > CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED turned on.
> > 
> > well, I tried the patch against 2.6.25-rc2-git1. It seems to be better 
> > but without CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED it is still even better.
> 
> could you try latest sched-devel.git, does it behave any better?

Here, it does not.  It seems fine without CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.

Oddity:  mainline git with Srivatsa's test patch improves markedly, and
using sched_latency_ns and sched_wakeup_granularity_ns, I can tweak the
regression into submission.  With sched-devel, I cannot tweak it away
with or without the test patch.  Dunno how useful that info is.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-18  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30 13:56 Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-01-31 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 10:55   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:17   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 14:36       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 14:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 17:00           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 12:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 12:29       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 13:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 13:49           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-14 16:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-17 20:26   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-18  4:28     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18  7:38       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2008-02-18  8:20         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-18  8:36           ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]             ` <1203325554.4889.2.camel@homer.simson.net>
     [not found]               ` <1203345102.5984.1.camel@homer.simson.net>
2008-02-19  8:15                 ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203320304.26269.3.camel@homer.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
    --subject='Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).