LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:36:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203323815.5443.4.camel@homer.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218082021.GD14419@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 13:50 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:38:24AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Here, it does not.  It seems fine without CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
> 
> My hunch is its because of the vruntime driven preemption which shoots
> up latencies (and the fact perhaps that Peter hasnt't focused more on SMP case
> yet!).
> 
> Curiously, do you observe the same results when in UP mode (maxcpus=1)?

No, I only see bad latency with SMP.

> FWIW, my test patch I had sent earlier didnt address the needs of UP, as Peter 
> pointed me out. In that direction, I had done more experimentation with the 
> patch below, which seemed to improve UP latencies also. Note that I
> don't particularly like the first hunk below, perhaps it needs to be
> surrounded by an if(something) ..

I'll try this patch later (errands).

	Thanks,

	-Mike

> 
> ---
>  kernel/sched_fair.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: current/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- current.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ current/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -523,8 +523,6 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, stru
>  		if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS))
>  			vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency;
>  
> -		/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
> -		vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime);
>  	}
>  
>  	se->vruntime = vruntime;
> @@ -816,6 +814,13 @@ hrtick_start_fair(struct rq *rq, struct 
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static inline void dequeue_stack(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +	for_each_sched_entity(se)
> +		if (se->on_rq)
> +			dequeue_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, 0);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
>   * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
> @@ -828,6 +833,9 @@ static void enqueue_task_fair(struct rq 
>  			    *topse = NULL;	/* Highest schedulable entity */
>  	int incload = 1;
>  
> +	if (wakeup)
> +		dequeue_stack(se);
> +
>  	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
>  		topse = se;
>  		if (se->on_rq) {
> 
> 
> 
> P.S : Sorry about slow responses, since I am now in a different project :(
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-18  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30 13:56 Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-01-31 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 10:55   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:17   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 14:36       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 14:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 17:00           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 12:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 12:29       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 13:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 13:49           ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-14 16:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-17 20:26   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-18  4:28     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18  7:38       ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-18  8:20         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-18  8:36           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
     [not found]             ` <1203325554.4889.2.camel@homer.simson.net>
     [not found]               ` <1203345102.5984.1.camel@homer.simson.net>
2008-02-19  8:15                 ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203323815.5443.4.camel@homer.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
    --subject='Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).