LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rientjes@google.com, nacc@us.ibm.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, clameter@sgi.com,
	Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy - update stale documentation and comments
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:20:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204662057.5338.104.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228230140.321581a4.pj@sgi.com>

Was Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask

On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:01 -0600, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Mel wrote:
> > A positive benefit of
> > this is that allocations using MPOL_BIND now use the local-node-ordered
> > zonelist instead of a custom node-id-ordered zonelist.
> 
> Could you update the now obsolete documentation (perhaps just delete
> the no longer correct remark):
> 
> Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt:
> 
>         MPOL_BIND:  This mode specifies that memory must come from the
>         set of nodes specified by the policy.
> 
>             The memory policy APIs do not specify an order in which the nodes
>             will be searched.  However, unlike "local allocation", the Bind
>             policy does not consider the distance between the nodes.  Rather,
>             allocations will fallback to the nodes specified by the policy in
>             order of numeric node id.  Like everything in Linux, this is subject
>             to change.
> 

How's this:

PATCH Mempolicy:  update documentation and comments

Address stale comments and numa_memory_policy.txt discussion
based on Mel Gorman's changes to page allocation zonelist handling.

Specifically:  mpol_free() and mpol_copy() no longer need to deal
with a custom zonelist for MPOL_BIND policy, and MPOL_BIND now
allocates memory from the nearest node with available memory in the
specified nodemask.

In "fixing" the mpol_free() and mpol_copy() comments in mempolicy.h,
I wanted to replace them with something, rather than just deleting
them.  So, I described the reference counting.  Not directly related
to the zonelist changes, but useful, IMO.

Signed-off-by:  Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>

 Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt |   11 +++--------
 include/linux/mempolicy.h               |    8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1.orig/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt	2008-01-24 17:58:37.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt	2008-03-04 14:44:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -182,14 +182,9 @@ Components of Memory Policies
 	    The Default mode does not use the optional set of nodes.
 
 	MPOL_BIND:  This mode specifies that memory must come from the
-	set of nodes specified by the policy.
-
-	    The memory policy APIs do not specify an order in which the nodes
-	    will be searched.  However, unlike "local allocation", the Bind
-	    policy does not consider the distance between the nodes.  Rather,
-	    allocations will fallback to the nodes specified by the policy in
-	    order of numeric node id.  Like everything in Linux, this is subject
-	    to change.
+	set of nodes specified by the policy.  Memory will be allocated from
+	the node in the set with sufficient free memory that is closest to
+	the node where the allocation takes place.
 
 	MPOL_PREFERRED:  This mode specifies that the allocation should be
 	attempted from the single node specified in the policy.  If that
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/include/linux/mempolicy.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2008-03-04 14:19:06.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2008-03-04 14:38:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -54,11 +54,13 @@ struct mm_struct;
  * mmap_sem.
  *
  * Freeing policy:
- * When policy is MPOL_BIND v.zonelist is kmalloc'ed and must be kfree'd.
- * All other policies don't have any external state. mpol_free() handles this.
+ * Mempolicy objects are reference counted.  A mempolicy will be freed when
+ * mpol_free() decrements the reference count to zero.
  *
  * Copying policy objects:
- * For MPOL_BIND the zonelist must be always duplicated. mpol_clone() does this.
+ * mpol_copy() allocates a new mempolicy and copies the specified mempolicy
+ * to the new storage.  The reference count of the new object is initialized
+ * to 1, representing the caller of mpol_copy().
  */
 struct mempolicy {
 	atomic_t refcnt;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-04 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 14:32 [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v9 Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] Introduce node_zonelist() for accessing the zonelist for a GFP mask Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 15:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 14:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by " Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 14:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] Have zonelist contains structs with both a zone pointer and zone_idx Mel Gorman
2007-11-20 15:34   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-11-09 14:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask Mel Gorman
2008-02-29  5:01   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 14:49     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-04 20:20     ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-03-05  0:35       ` [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy - update stale documentation and comments Paul Jackson
2008-03-07 11:53       ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 14:34 ` [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 15:45   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 16:14     ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-09 16:19       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 16:45       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-11-09 17:18         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-11-09 17:26           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 18:16             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-11-09 18:20               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-11-09 18:22                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-11 14:16             ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-12 19:07               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 18:14           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2007-11-20 14:19     ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-20 15:14       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-11-20 16:21         ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-20 20:19           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-20 20:18       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-20 21:26         ` Mel Gorman
2007-11-20 21:33         ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-20 21:38           ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1204662057.5338.104.camel@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).