LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
hpj@urpla.net, stable <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix race in schedule
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205182914.6241.322.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D59FFB.8030201@ct.jp.nec.com>
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:54 -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:01 -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> >
> >> thanks, your patch looks nice to me.
> >> I had focused setprio, on_rq=0 and running=1 situation, it makes me to
> >> fix these functions.
> >> But one point, I've just noticed. I'm not sure on same situation against
> >> sched_rt. I think the pre_schedule() of rt has chance to drop rq lock.
> >> Is it OK?
> >
> > Ah, you are quite right, that'll teach me to rush out a patch just
> > because dinner is ready :-).
> >
> > How about we submit the following patch for mainline and CC -stable to
> > fix .23 and .24:
>
> thanks for working, I'm OK, and will test it soon.
> IIRC, it came from the group scheduling, .23 probably doesn't have this issue.
Might not have this exact race, but I've checked both .23 and .24, both
can unlock the rq before we do ->put_prev_task(), leaving a window for
potential nasties. I'm rather safe than sorry :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-10 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-10 18:01 Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-10 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-10 20:01 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-10 20:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-10 20:54 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-10 21:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-03-10 21:07 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-11 2:12 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-11 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-11 17:10 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-11 23:38 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-12 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-12 14:48 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-12 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-14 17:58 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-03-14 22:47 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-03-14 22:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-20 5:44 ` Sripathi Kodi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205182914.6241.322.camel@lappy \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] sched: fix race in schedule' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).