LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
To: Cyrus Massoumi <cyrusm@gmx.net>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	"Molnar, Ingo" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5 (vs 2.6.22)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:12:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205277132.12854.19.camel@entropy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47D6FAD0.1020608@gmx.net>


On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 22:34 +0100, Cyrus Massoumi wrote:
> Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> > (Also, ignoring MySQL because it's a terrible piece of software at least
> > when regarding it's scalability is a bad idea. It's the M in LAMP, it
> > has a huge user base, and FreeBSD manages to outperform Linux with the
> > same unscalable piece of software.)
> 
> Did you actually see this? 
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/sysbench/
> 
> FreeBSD does not outperform Linux, it's actually a bit faster according 
> to Nick's tests.

I am aware of those results, but in the mail I was responding to, Nick
Piggin said the following:

> The problem with MySQL contention means that if the scheduler
> unluckily chooses to deschedule a lock holder, then you can get
> idle time building up on other cores and you can get context switch
> cascades as things all pile up onto this heavily contended lock. As
> such, it means MySQL is not an ideal candidate for looking at
> performance behaviour. I discounted the relatively worse scaling of
> MySQL with 2.6.25-rc (than 2.6.22) as such an effect.

which I interpreted to mean that MySQL performs worse on 2.6.23+ than on
2.6.22 but for some reason this doesn't matter.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-11 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-11  6:49 Nick Piggin
2008-03-11  7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11  8:28   ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-11  9:59     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 21:07 ` Nicholas Miell
2008-03-11 21:34   ` Cyrus Massoumi
2008-03-11 23:12     ` Nicholas Miell [this message]
2008-03-11 23:42       ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-11 23:47       ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-12  9:00       ` Zhang, Yanmin
     [not found] ` <20080311102538.GA30551@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <20080311120230.GA5386@elte.hu>
2008-03-12  1:21     ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-12  7:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-17  0:44         ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-17  5:16           ` Ray Lee
2008-03-17  5:21             ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-17  7:19               ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-17  8:26                 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-17  8:54                   ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-17  9:28                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-17  9:56                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-17 10:16                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-17  5:34             ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-14 15:42 Xose Vazquez Perez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1205277132.12854.19.camel@entropy \
    --to=nmiell@comcast.net \
    --cc=cyrusm@gmx.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --subject='Re: Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5 (vs 2.6.22)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).