LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: build failure
@ 2008-10-20 12:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-20 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles, LKML,
Andrew Morton, linus
Hi Greg,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
I applied the following patch.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:59:18 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] staging: sxg depends on X86
sxghif.h has code that explicitly will not build fo other architecures.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
index 1ae3508..6e6cf0b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
config SXG
tristate "Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated 10Gbe support"
depends on PCI && NETDEV_10000
+ depends on X86
default n
help
This driver supports the Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 12:04 linux-next: build failure Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 16:33 ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 21:17 ` patch staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2008-10-20 21:32 ` gregkh
2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2008-10-20 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles, LKML,
Andrew Morton, linus
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
>
> I applied the following patch.
Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
tree, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
@ 2008-10-20 16:33 ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 16:51 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: J.R. Mauro @ 2008-10-20 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles,
LKML, Andrew Morton, linus
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
>> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
>>
>> I applied the following patch.
>
> Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
> tree, thanks.
Greg,
The slicoss driver also from Alacritech looks like it needs a depends
on X86 as well. Should the sxg and slicoss drivers from Alacritech be
doing things like this (sxg/sxghif.h:851, slicoss/slicoss.c:960):
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
...
#else
Stop Compilation;
#endif
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 16:33 ` J.R. Mauro
@ 2008-10-20 16:51 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 20:47 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2008-10-20 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J.R. Mauro
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles,
LKML, Andrew Morton, linus
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:33:29PM -0400, J.R. Mauro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
> >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
> >>
> >> I applied the following patch.
> >
> > Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
> > tree, thanks.
>
> Greg,
>
> The slicoss driver also from Alacritech looks like it needs a depends
> on X86 as well. Should the sxg and slicoss drivers from Alacritech be
> doing things like this (sxg/sxghif.h:851, slicoss/slicoss.c:960):
Yes, it needs it too.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 16:51 ` Greg KH
@ 2008-10-20 20:47 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 22:34 ` J.R. Mauro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2008-10-20 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J.R. Mauro
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles,
LKML, Andrew Morton, linus
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:51:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:33:29PM -0400, J.R. Mauro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi Greg,
> > >>
> > >> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > >>
> > >> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
> > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
> > >>
> > >> I applied the following patch.
> > >
> > > Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
> > > tree, thanks.
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > The slicoss driver also from Alacritech looks like it needs a depends
> > on X86 as well. Should the sxg and slicoss drivers from Alacritech be
> > doing things like this (sxg/sxghif.h:851, slicoss/slicoss.c:960):
>
> Yes, it needs it too.
Hm, it already has this dependancy. In drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig
we have:
config SLICOSS
tristate "Alacritech Gigabit IS-NIC support"
depends on PCI && X86 && NETDEV_1000
So we should be fine here.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* patch staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree
2008-10-20 12:04 linux-next: build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
@ 2008-10-20 21:17 ` gregkh
2008-10-20 21:32 ` gregkh
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2008-10-20 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfr, akpm, charrer, gregkh, greg, linux-kernel, mmiles
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Subject: Staging: sxg depends on X86
Subject: linux-next: build failure
to my gregkh-2.6 tree. Its filename is
staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch
This tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/
>From sfr@canb.auug.org.au Mon Oct 20 13:45:45 2008
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:59:18 +1100
Subject: Staging: sxg depends on X86
Subject: linux-next: build failure
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Harrer <charrer@alacritech.com>, Michael Miles <mmiles@alacritech.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linus
Message-ID: <20081020230420.aa85f83b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
sxghif.h has code that explicitly will not build fo other architecures.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/staging/sxg/README | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
config SXG
tristate "Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated 10Gbe support"
depends on PCI && NETDEV_10000
+ depends on X86
default n
help
This driver supports the Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated
--- a/drivers/staging/sxg/README
+++ b/drivers/staging/sxg/README
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ TODO:
- remove wrappers
- checkpatch.pl cleanups
- new functionality that the card needs
+ - remove reliance on x86
Please send patches to:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Patches currently in gregkh-2.6 which might be from sfr@canb.auug.org.au are
bad/battery-class-driver.patch
staging/staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* patch staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree
2008-10-20 12:04 linux-next: build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 21:17 ` patch staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
@ 2008-10-20 21:32 ` gregkh
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2008-10-20 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfr, akpm, charrer, gregkh, greg, linux-kernel, mmiles
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Subject: Staging: sxg depends on X86
Subject: linux-next: build failure
to my gregkh-2.6 tree. Its filename is
staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch
This tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/
>From sfr@canb.auug.org.au Mon Oct 20 13:45:45 2008
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:59:18 +1100
Subject: Staging: sxg depends on X86
Subject: linux-next: build failure
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Harrer <charrer@alacritech.com>, Michael Miles <mmiles@alacritech.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linus
Message-ID: <20081020230420.aa85f83b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
sxghif.h has code that explicitly will not build fo other architecures.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/staging/sxg/README | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/staging/sxg/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
config SXG
tristate "Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated 10Gbe support"
depends on PCI && NETDEV_10000
+ depends on X86
default n
help
This driver supports the Alacritech SLIC Technology Non-Accelerated
--- a/drivers/staging/sxg/README
+++ b/drivers/staging/sxg/README
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ TODO:
- remove wrappers
- checkpatch.pl cleanups
- new functionality that the card needs
+ - remove reliance on x86
Please send patches to:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Patches currently in gregkh-2.6 which might be from sfr@canb.auug.org.au are
bad/battery-class-driver.patch
staging/staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 16:33 ` J.R. Mauro
@ 2008-10-20 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-20 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles, LKML,
Andrew Morton, linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 325 bytes --]
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:48:57 -0700 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
> tree, thanks.
Linus seems to have already applied it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure
2008-10-20 20:47 ` Greg KH
@ 2008-10-20 22:34 ` J.R. Mauro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: J.R. Mauro @ 2008-10-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, Christopher Harrer, Michael Miles,
LKML, Andrew Morton, linus
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:51:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:33:29PM -0400, J.R. Mauro wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:04:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >> Hi Greg,
> > > >>
> > > >> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > > >>
> > > >> In file included from drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:77:
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxghif.h:859: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Compilation'
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_transmit_packet':
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1949: error: 'SXG_SGL_BUF_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: error: implicit declaration of function 'SXG_SGL_BUFFER'
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:1958: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c: In function 'sxg_mcast_set_mask':
> > > >> drivers/staging/sxg/sxg.c:2846: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64'
> > > >>
> > > >> I applied the following patch.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, doh, sorry, I should have caught that. I'll go apply this to the
> > > > tree, thanks.
> > >
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > The slicoss driver also from Alacritech looks like it needs a depends
> > > on X86 as well. Should the sxg and slicoss drivers from Alacritech be
> > > doing things like this (sxg/sxghif.h:851, slicoss/slicoss.c:960):
> >
> > Yes, it needs it too.
>
> Hm, it already has this dependancy. In drivers/staging/slicoss/Kconfig
> we have:
> config SLICOSS
> tristate "Alacritech Gigabit IS-NIC support"
> depends on PCI && X86 && NETDEV_1000
>
> So we should be fine here.
Sorry about that, had to pull from Linus's tree
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-20 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-20 12:04 linux-next: build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 16:33 ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 16:51 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 20:47 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 22:34 ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 21:17 ` patch staging-sxg-depends-on-x86.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2008-10-20 21:32 ` gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).