LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	autofs@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:02:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225153622.2938.1.camel@zeus.themaw.net>


This response is a bit confusing, let me try to fix that.

On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:27 +0900, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:35:22 +0800
> > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Remove unnecessary string terminator check.
> > 
> > Why is it unnecessary?
> > 
> > Does this change alter behaviour in any way?
> > 
> > Does it fix a bug?
> 
> Umm .... it was done in response to your comment, quoted below ...
> 
<quote>
> > +/*
> > + * Check a string doesn't overrun the chunk of
> > + * memory we copied from user land.
> > + */
> > +static int invalid_str(char *str, void *end)
> > +{
> > +     while ((void *) str <= end)
> > +             if (!*str++)
> > +                     return 0;
> > +     return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> 
> What is this?  We copy strings in from userspace in 10000 different
> places without needing checks such as this?
</quote>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-28  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23  2:35 [PATCH 1/6] autofs4 - correct offset mount expire check Ian Kent
2008-10-23  2:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:31   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28  0:27     ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28  0:55       ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28  1:04         ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28  1:02       ` Ian Kent [this message]
2008-10-23  2:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4 - collect version check return Ian Kent
2008-10-23  2:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4 - make autofs type usage explicit Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:40   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28  0:28     ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 13:24     ` Jeff Moyer
2008-10-23  2:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4 - improve parameter usage Ian Kent
2008-10-23  2:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4 - cleanup expire code duplication Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).