LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:02:17 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1225153622.2938.1.camel@zeus.themaw.net> This response is a bit confusing, let me try to fix that. On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:27 +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:35:22 +0800 > > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote: > > > > > Remove unnecessary string terminator check. > > > > Why is it unnecessary? > > > > Does this change alter behaviour in any way? > > > > Does it fix a bug? > > Umm .... it was done in response to your comment, quoted below ... > <quote> > > +/* > > + * Check a string doesn't overrun the chunk of > > + * memory we copied from user land. > > + */ > > +static int invalid_str(char *str, void *end) > > +{ > > + while ((void *) str <= end) > > + if (!*str++) > > + return 0; > > + return -EINVAL; > > +} > > What is this? We copy strings in from userspace in 10000 different > places without needing checks such as this? </quote>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-28 1:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-10-23 2:35 [PATCH 1/6] autofs4 - correct offset mount expire check Ian Kent 2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check Ian Kent 2008-10-27 20:31 ` Andrew Morton 2008-10-28 0:27 ` Ian Kent 2008-10-28 0:55 ` Andrew Morton 2008-10-28 1:04 ` Ian Kent 2008-10-28 1:02 ` Ian Kent [this message] 2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4 - collect version check return Ian Kent 2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4 - make autofs type usage explicit Ian Kent 2008-10-27 20:40 ` Andrew Morton 2008-10-28 0:28 ` Ian Kent 2008-10-28 13:24 ` Jeff Moyer 2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4 - improve parameter usage Ian Kent 2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4 - cleanup expire code duplication Ian Kent
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1225155737.2938.17.camel@zeus.themaw.net \ --to=raven@themaw.net \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).