LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: faggioli@gandalf.sssup.it
Cc: henrik@austad.us, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
fabio@gandalf.sssup.it,
Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"gregory.haskins" <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deadline scheduling (was: Re: Rearranging layout of code in the scheduler)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:48:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225388883.7803.217.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225387034.7803.182.camel@twins>
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Personally I'd like to see the full priority inversion issue solved by
> something like the proxy execution protocol, however the SMP extension
> thereof seems to be a tad expensive - found a book on graph theory, all
> that remains is finding time to read it :-)
>
> The advantage of proxy execution is that its fully invariant to the
> schedule function and thus even works for proportional fair schedulers
> and any kind of scheduler hierarchy.
Basically the problem that I'm looking at is:
Given a directed acyclic graph G, with entry nodes E (those who don't
have an inbound edge) and exit nodes X (those without an outbound edge)
then given an exit node x of X, split the graph into G1 and G2 so that
G1 contains x and all paths leading to it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-30 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 15:34 Rearranging layout of code in the scheduler Henrik Austad
2008-10-28 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-28 19:41 ` Henrik Austad
2008-10-30 16:49 ` faggioli
2008-10-30 17:17 ` Deadline scheduling (was: Re: Rearranging layout of code in the scheduler) Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-30 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-10-30 21:44 ` Henrik Austad
2008-10-31 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-31 12:09 ` Henrik Austad
2008-10-31 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-31 15:05 ` Henrik Austad
2008-10-31 18:08 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-10-31 17:49 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225388883.7803.217.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fabio@gandalf.sssup.it \
--cc=faggioli@gandalf.sssup.it \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trimarchimichael@yahoo.it \
--subject='Re: Deadline scheduling (was: Re: Rearranging layout of code in the scheduler)' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).