LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: next-20081030: voyager compile busted
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:24:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225398287.19324.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030180323.GA13399@x200.localdomain>

On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 21:03 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On i386-voyager:
> 
>   Using /src/linux-1 as source for kernel
>   GEN     /src/build/i386-voyager/Makefile
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
>   CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/tsc.o
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c: In function 'unsynchronized_tsc':
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:763: error: implicit declaration of function 'apic_is_clustered_box'
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/tsc.o] Error 1
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.o
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.c: In function 'detect_extended_topology':
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.c:120: error: implicit declaration of function 'phys_pkg_id'
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/addon_cpuid_features.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu] Error 2
> make[2]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
>   CC      arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.o
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c: In function 'intr_init_hook':
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_intr_init'
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c: In function 'machine_specific_memory_setup':
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c:65: warning: unused variable 'new_nr'
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.o] Error 1
>   CC      arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.o
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c:67: error: conflicting types for 'phys_cpu_present_map'
> arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h:143: error: previous declaration of 'phys_cpu_present_map' was here
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c: In function 'start_secondary':
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c:444: error: implicit declaration of function 'notify_cpu_starting'
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c: In function 'smp_call_function_interrupt':
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c:955: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_smp_call_function_interrupt'
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single_interrupt':
> arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c:963: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt'
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/mach-voyager] Error 2

Yes ... present in the 2.6.28-rc as well.  I've got it all fixed up
locally.

This type of breakage is more or less expected given that I wait until
-rc1 for the tree to stop churning before trying to fix voyager and the
subarchitectures, and the fact that the current way x86 is being
developed tends to break them.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-30 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-30  6:30 linux-next: Tree for October 30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-30 18:03 ` next-20081030: voyager compile busted Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-30 20:24   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-10-30 20:52     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-30 20:58       ` James Bottomley
2008-10-30 21:07         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-30 21:21           ` James Bottomley
2008-10-30 21:42             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-30 21:47               ` James Bottomley
2008-10-30 21:50                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-30 22:40                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 17:42                     ` James Bottomley
2008-10-30 21:24       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-30 23:42   ` Tony Breeds
2008-10-30 23:55 ` linux-next: Tree for October 30 Randy Dunlap
2008-10-31  6:25   ` Greg KH
2008-10-31 16:40     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1225398287.19324.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --subject='Re: next-20081030: voyager compile busted' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).