LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@nameil.org,
serue@us.ibm.com, morgan@kernel.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
esandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 2/4] vm: use new has_capability_noaudit
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:39:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226072344.16320.62.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081107152332.10328.12878.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 10:23 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> The oomkiller calculations make decisions based on capabilities. Since
> these are not security decisions and LSMs should not record if they fall
> the request they should use the new has_capability_noaudit() interface so
> the denials will not be recorded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
> ---
>
> mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index a0a0190..df259c2 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
> * Superuser processes are usually more important, so we make it
> * less likely that we kill those.
> */
> - if (has_capability(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
> - has_capability(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
> + has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> points /= 4;
>
> /*
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
> * tend to only have this flag set on applications they think
> * of as important.
> */
> - if (has_capability(p, CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> points /= 4;
>
> /*
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-07 15:23 [PATCH -v3 1/4] SECURITY: new capable_noaudit interface Eric Paris
2008-11-07 15:23 ` [PATCH -v3 2/4] vm: use new has_capability_noaudit Eric Paris
2008-11-07 15:39 ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2008-11-07 15:23 ` [PATCH -v3 3/4] filesystems: use has_capability_noaudit interface for reserved blocks checks Eric Paris
2008-11-07 15:23 ` [PATCH -v3 4/4] SELinux: use new cap_noaudit interface Eric Paris
2008-11-07 15:38 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1226072344.16320.62.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil \
--to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@nameil.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH -v3 2/4] vm: use new has_capability_noaudit' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).