LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com,
	shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	jack@suse.cz, snitzer@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, josef@redhat.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:59:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295625598-15203-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295625598-15203-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

rq == &q->flush_rq was used to determine whether a rq is part of a
flush sequence, which worked because all requests in a flush sequence
were sequenced using the single dedicated request.  This is about to
change, so introduce REQ_FLUSH_SEQ flag to distinguish flush sequence
requests.

This patch doesn't cause any behavior change.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-core.c          |    4 ++--
 block/blk-flush.c         |    1 +
 block/blk.h               |    2 +-
 include/linux/blk_types.h |    2 ++
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 2f4002f..22e0b4f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
 
-	if (&q->flush_rq != rq) {
+	if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)) {
 		if (error)
 			clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
 		else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ static void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req)
 	 * normal IO on queueing nor completion.  Accounting the
 	 * containing request is enough.
 	 */
-	if (blk_do_io_stat(req) && req != &req->q->flush_rq) {
+	if (blk_do_io_stat(req) && !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)) {
 		unsigned long duration = jiffies - req->start_time;
 		const int rw = rq_data_dir(req);
 		struct hd_struct *part;
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 54b123d..8592869 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static struct request *queue_next_fseq(struct request_queue *q)
 		BUG();
 	}
 
+	rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_FLUSH_SEQ;
 	elv_insert(q, rq, ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT);
 	return rq;
 }
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 2db8f32..9d2ee8f 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline struct request *__elv_next_request(struct request_queue *q)
 		while (!list_empty(&q->queue_head)) {
 			rq = list_entry_rq(q->queue_head.next);
 			if (!(rq->cmd_flags & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) ||
-			    rq == &q->flush_rq)
+			    (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ))
 				return rq;
 			rq = blk_do_flush(q, rq);
 			if (rq)
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 46ad519..dddedfc 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
 	__REQ_ALLOCED,		/* request came from our alloc pool */
 	__REQ_COPY_USER,	/* contains copies of user pages */
 	__REQ_FLUSH,		/* request for cache flush */
+	__REQ_FLUSH_SEQ,	/* request for flush sequence */
 	__REQ_IO_STAT,		/* account I/O stat */
 	__REQ_MIXED_MERGE,	/* merge of different types, fail separately */
 	__REQ_SECURE,		/* secure discard (used with __REQ_DISCARD) */
@@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
 #define REQ_ALLOCED		(1 << __REQ_ALLOCED)
 #define REQ_COPY_USER		(1 << __REQ_COPY_USER)
 #define REQ_FLUSH		(1 << __REQ_FLUSH)
+#define REQ_FLUSH_SEQ		(1 << __REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)
 #define REQ_IO_STAT		(1 << __REQ_IO_STAT)
 #define REQ_MIXED_MERGE		(1 << __REQ_MIXED_MERGE)
 #define REQ_SECURE		(1 << __REQ_SECURE)
-- 
1.7.1


  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-21 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21         ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39           ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56           ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22  0:49   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41   ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26  5:27       ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03     ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38       ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03  9:28               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48                 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24               ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58                     ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54                 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  9:24             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1295625598-15203-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).