LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com,
shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
jack@suse.cz, snitzer@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, josef@redhat.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:59:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295625598-15203-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295625598-15203-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
rq == &q->flush_rq was used to determine whether a rq is part of a
flush sequence, which worked because all requests in a flush sequence
were sequenced using the single dedicated request. This is about to
change, so introduce REQ_FLUSH_SEQ flag to distinguish flush sequence
requests.
This patch doesn't cause any behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
block/blk-flush.c | 1 +
block/blk.h | 2 +-
include/linux/blk_types.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 2f4002f..22e0b4f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
- if (&q->flush_rq != rq) {
+ if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)) {
if (error)
clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
@@ -1804,7 +1804,7 @@ static void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req)
* normal IO on queueing nor completion. Accounting the
* containing request is enough.
*/
- if (blk_do_io_stat(req) && req != &req->q->flush_rq) {
+ if (blk_do_io_stat(req) && !(req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)) {
unsigned long duration = jiffies - req->start_time;
const int rw = rq_data_dir(req);
struct hd_struct *part;
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 54b123d..8592869 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static struct request *queue_next_fseq(struct request_queue *q)
BUG();
}
+ rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_FLUSH_SEQ;
elv_insert(q, rq, ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT);
return rq;
}
diff --git a/block/blk.h b/block/blk.h
index 2db8f32..9d2ee8f 100644
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline struct request *__elv_next_request(struct request_queue *q)
while (!list_empty(&q->queue_head)) {
rq = list_entry_rq(q->queue_head.next);
if (!(rq->cmd_flags & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) ||
- rq == &q->flush_rq)
+ (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ))
return rq;
rq = blk_do_flush(q, rq);
if (rq)
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index 46ad519..dddedfc 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
__REQ_ALLOCED, /* request came from our alloc pool */
__REQ_COPY_USER, /* contains copies of user pages */
__REQ_FLUSH, /* request for cache flush */
+ __REQ_FLUSH_SEQ, /* request for flush sequence */
__REQ_IO_STAT, /* account I/O stat */
__REQ_MIXED_MERGE, /* merge of different types, fail separately */
__REQ_SECURE, /* secure discard (used with __REQ_DISCARD) */
@@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
#define REQ_ALLOCED (1 << __REQ_ALLOCED)
#define REQ_COPY_USER (1 << __REQ_COPY_USER)
#define REQ_FLUSH (1 << __REQ_FLUSH)
+#define REQ_FLUSH_SEQ (1 << __REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)
#define REQ_IO_STAT (1 << __REQ_IO_STAT)
#define REQ_MIXED_MERGE (1 << __REQ_MIXED_MERGE)
#define REQ_SECURE (1 << __REQ_SECURE)
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22 0:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 5:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38 ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 9:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295625598-15203-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).