LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com,
shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
jack@suse.cz, snitzer@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, josef@redhat.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:59:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295625598-15203-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295625598-15203-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
bio's for flush are completed twice - once during the data phase and
one more time after the whole sequence is complete. The first
completion shouldn't notify completion to the issuer.
This was achieved by skipping all bio completion steps in
req_bio_endio() for the first completion; however, this has two
drawbacks.
* Error is not recorded in bio and must be tracked somewhere else.
* Partial completion is not supported.
Both don't cause problems for the current users; however, they make
further improvements difficult. Change req_bio_endio() such that it
only skips the actual notification part for the first completion. bio
completion is implemented with partial completions on mind anyway so
this is as simple as moving the REQ_FLUSH_SEQ conditional such that
only calling of bio_endio() is skipped.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 22e0b4f..038519b 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -151,37 +151,31 @@ static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
- if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ)) {
- if (error)
- clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
- else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
- error = -EIO;
-
- if (unlikely(nbytes > bio->bi_size)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: want %u bytes done, %u left\n",
- __func__, nbytes, bio->bi_size);
- nbytes = bio->bi_size;
- }
+ if (error)
+ clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
+ else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
+ error = -EIO;
+
+ if (unlikely(nbytes > bio->bi_size)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: want %u bytes done, %u left\n",
+ __func__, nbytes, bio->bi_size);
+ nbytes = bio->bi_size;
+ }
- if (unlikely(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_QUIET))
- set_bit(BIO_QUIET, &bio->bi_flags);
+ if (unlikely(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_QUIET))
+ set_bit(BIO_QUIET, &bio->bi_flags);
- bio->bi_size -= nbytes;
- bio->bi_sector += (nbytes >> 9);
+ bio->bi_size -= nbytes;
+ bio->bi_sector += (nbytes >> 9);
- if (bio_integrity(bio))
- bio_integrity_advance(bio, nbytes);
+ if (bio_integrity(bio))
+ bio_integrity_advance(bio, nbytes);
- if (bio->bi_size == 0)
- bio_endio(bio, error);
- } else {
- /*
- * Okay, this is the sequenced flush request in
- * progress, just record the error;
- */
- if (error && !q->flush_err)
- q->flush_err = error;
- }
+ /* don't actually finish bio if it's part of flush sequence */
+ if (bio->bi_size == 0 && !(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ))
+ bio_endio(bio, error);
+ else if (error && !q->flush_err)
+ q->flush_err = error;
}
void blk_dump_rq_flags(struct request *rq, char *msg)
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22 0:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 5:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38 ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 9:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295625598-15203-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).