From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753199Ab1A0TwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:52:07 -0500 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:42992 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752516Ab1A0TwF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:52:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] Fix kconfig breakage wrt to CONFIGFS_FS From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel , linux-netdev , Joel Becker , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , Americo Wang , David Miller , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20110127194157.GA7565@elte.hu> References: <1296155430-3796-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20110127194157.GA7565@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:52:01 -0800 Message-Id: <1296157921.14831.174.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:41 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > The following four patches are to address recent Kconfig CONFIGFS_FS -> > > 'select SYSFS' change for GFS2_FS, and 'depends && SYSFS && CONFIGFS_FS' > > breakage for NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC, DLM, and OCFS2_FS in .38-rc2. > > > > Please review and consider pulling from: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/scsi-post-merge-2.6.git for-linus-v2 > > I had the original for-linus branch tested rather extensively, and that one had no > problems. What's different in -v2? > Hi Ingo, The extra code is in patch #1 that fixes an additional GFS2_FS warning reported by Randy that appeared after the initial CONFIGFS_FS -> 'select SYSFS' conversion. This patch for GFS2_FS was in scsi-post-merge-2.6.git/for-linus, but was not included in the shortlog/stat to Linus. So considering my current (poor) record with Kconfig changes in mainline, I figured that sending them out to the list one more time for review would make the most sense. ;) Thanks, --nab